User talk:Izzy.vin/sandbox

In your brief explanations of your articles, I found it great how you managed to include not only the benefits of the changes you've analyzed in your material, but have also included the potential drawbacks that might arise from your research. This duality of information is great for the reader to truly gain a holistic view of the information you have presented. I think for improvements, would it be potentially possible to discuss any influence that the material your reporting on may have influenced or sparked? I ask this because I noticed the historical point of view that you're writing from, and I was hoping to potentially learn more about it. However, I overall feel like the information presented was concise and direct without the addition of too much fluff. - Brian V. (GPP 105)