User talk:Izzy Moony/Archives/2009/July

Speedy deletion nomination of Atcomet.net
A tag has been placed on Atcomet.net requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. GrooveDog (talk) (Review) 18:30, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

help me
please help me finish my creation of my first article,atcomet.net--Mjfan1 (talk) 18:35, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * It'll be deleted soon because it's non-notable and blatant advertising. sixty nine   • spill it •  20:02, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

SHUT UP!!!!!! Mjfan1 (• spill it •) 20:02, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

this is why i need help
look under--Mjfan1 (talk) 20:01, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Atcomet.net
A tag has been placed on Atcomet.net requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mjfan1 (talk) 20:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

New Page
You can now follow me on wikisource! --Mjfan1 (talk) 22:32, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Test edits
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 23:00, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

i did not test edit it--Mjfan1 (talk) 23:02, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The edit (as well as the last edit to Google) was pointless and was removed. OhNo itsJamie Talk 23:04, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

I did not do that on the computer prank articleMjfan1 (talk) 20:52, 23 July 2009
 * I beg to differ. OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:58, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Ididnt do that,i was o myspace at the time(i record my events of the day)--Mjfan1 (talk) 21:01, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * BTW, you may want to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's WP:CheckUser capabilities, lest you wish to continue playing games with multiple accounts. OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:07, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Indeed this edit is a dead give-away that User:GestOfLove is you. And just to let you know, using multiple accounts to try to influence a discussion like you did here is forbidden by Wikipedia policy on multiple accounts and will result in the other account and possibly this account in being blocked. — ℳℴℯ   ε  14:31, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

UGH!!! i just read about the usurperations.i shouldve done that first......--Mjfan1 (talk) 21:33, 26 July 2009 (UTC)