User talk:J'espère69

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Materialscientist (talk) 23:10, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 03:20, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Kat Graham. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —C.Fred (talk) 20:04, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Scottish English. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Mutt Lunker (talk) 09:23, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Afro-Caribbean, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Please provide informative edit summaries
Hello. I noticed that, in most of your edits, you fill out the edit summary with the same text every time:  . Unfortunately, it is not clear from this exactly what changes you made and why. Please would you provide a more informative summary for each edit you make? Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. It doesn't have to be long, just relevant. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thank you. – Wdchk (talk) 17:54, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Liberia
Hi, thanks for working on the Liberia article, but please, let's discuss it on the Talk page. The Lead is much too long, with too many details that belong in the body of the article. It's really not important that it has one of two capitals named for American presidents, for instance. I worked a long time on trying to get that Lead to more manageable proportions, and you and another editor just reverted it. That's easy, but the Lead is once again way too long and too detailed, not reflecting the article.Parkwells (talk) 19:53, 5 December 2015 (UTC)