User talk:Jæs/Archives/2011/February

10ZiG
Hi Jaes - I have sent you an email regarding an article which was deleted, but please reply back to my talk page. Thanks (Jcalamity (talk) 15:05, 6 February 2011 (UTC))
 * Responding on your talk. jæs (talk)  15:48, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Priceless
I just wanted to tell you how much I enjoyed your comment at Talk:SP, about uniting all of the editors. That made my day. :-D Zaereth (talk) 00:01, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Sarah Palin article and the Montreal Prank Call and your revert and revert description presumption
Your revert of one line about this call and your description in the edit note are based on a false recount of an "overwhelming consensus" to not include it in the past. I suggest that you undo your revert to allow a discussion, at least of the point made by several in your camp on waiting to see if it remained notable 2 years down the road. It fits well with the Fey parodies that immediately precede it and is notable for several aspects of its content.--— ⦿⨦⨀Tumadoireacht Talk/Stalk 01:33, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The burden is on you to clearly show that there is consensus supporting the content. Unless or until that occurs, the content should not be in the article. jæs (talk)  03:44, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Courtesy notification
Hi. Since the time that you have commented at Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents (where there was some messy brainstorming about what terms are necessary for an unblock), a specific proposal has been made by Doc James about the restrictions/conditions that will come into effect upon the user being unblocked. Your comments/views on this proposal are welcome. Regards, Ncmvocalist (talk) 09:08, 10 February 2011 (UTC)