User talk:J-g

Definitions
Thank you for taking the time to leave your invaluable feedback. I am a little uncertain as to some of the points you are making and, to be honest, I am comfortable with that, you need not expand any further. You do, however, raise an interesting question as to the true meaning of encyclopaedic - common definitions include words such as: comprehensive, complete, thorough, full, exhaustive, in-depth, wide-ranging, all-inclusive, all-embracing, all-encompassing, universal, vast, compendious. Modern interpretations tend to err rather towards the concise, the executive summary etc. Even in that dictionary definition phrases such as "all-inclusive" and "all-embracing" seem so far from where many of us are today.

Where once we might have been loquacious, sought to expand and expound upon a subject until the very marrow of it was pounded to it's own constituent components, we now summarise and abbreviate, to cull the superfluous until nothing but the constituent components are left. The data remains but without context.

J-G

RAF Fairford
Thanks for contributing to the article RAF Fairford. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 15:51, 16 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, I wasn't sure how to cite the evidence of the screen grab from ADSBExchange I added to the page showing the take off path from the airfield. J-g (talk) 16:54, 16 March 2022 (UTC)