User talk:J.B.

Date formats
I've reverted an edit you made to MV Brigitte Bardot because it inappropriately added commas to dates. I noticed the same thing in an earlier edit of yours, so it seemed prudent to point you to MOS:DATE. Please especially note MOS:BADDATEFORMAT. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 13:31, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lake Okeechobee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Army Corps of Engineers. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Pocahontas
I have started a discussion at Talk:Pocahontas about the addition of a mention of Camp Matoaka in the article. - Donald Albury 14:03, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

April 2024
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Bachelor. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 17:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

"Bachelor" Talk Page
Hello, could you please address my points in favor of changing the list for the "Bachelor" article on its talk page? Thank you. IAmACowWhoIsMad (talk) 20:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Bringing in a third opinion
Hi, I am going to be using WP:3O to help resolve our dispute on the Bachelor article. I have added a reply on the talk page adding some of my final thoughts for this dispute. In the interest of fairness, I am reaching out to ask you if you potentially wanted to add some of your final thoughts as well, or if you want to let your arguments stand on their own. Please reply as soon as you can. IAmACowWhoIsMad (talk) 00:02, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Bachelor. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. &#126;~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:40, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please stop. If you continue to assume ownership of articles, as you did at Bachelor, you may be blocked from editing. Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive, and is a violation of Wikipedia policy. &#126;~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:44, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bachelor. Drmies (talk) 14:45, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Bachelor) for longterm edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 14:46, 15 May 2024 (UTC)