User talk:J. Ash Bowie

Welcome to my talk page! You are invited to leave me messages, suggestions, questions, and corrections. Please, be polite and assume good intent. ''If I do not respond to your message or I delete it, it is probably because you violated one or both these rules. Otherwise, let 'er rip!''

Psychology article
I just caught your last edit to Psychology (haven't looked back at others), and though a small edit, I thought it was excellent. I'd encourage you to continue boldly editing the article. Places in the article give the reader the impression that behaviorism is still ascendant (decades outdated!). Parts of the article need to be rewritten. Some content and some omissions ("Observation in natural settings" section, "Survey questionnaires" section) seem to indicate that a lot of the writing was done by people who have only a popular (30 years outdated) grasp of the subject matter. -Do c t orW  17:35, 23 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the encouragement. All in all, the psychology article isn't very good...I'd give it a C+. For such a core topic, it should really shine. So, bold editing does seem to be the way to go... :) —Ash (talk) 02:27, 24 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I think there are more important parts of the article to work on other than the research-practitioner gap issue. I think its a subtopic of clinical psychology and it could be delt with there. But its also a philosophy of science/psychology issue. For a main article I like to see the sort of content and quality as included in a good university level psychology text book. Maybe it should be written more for a general public audience. Action potential t c 05:59, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

History of psychotherapy
Hi J. Ash Bowie. You are off to such a great start on the article History of psychotherapy that it may qualify to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page under the Did you know... section. The Main Page gets about 4,000,000 hits per day and appearing on the Main Page may help bring publicity and assistance to the article. However, there is a five day from article creation window for Did you know... nominations. Before five days pass from the date the article was created and if you haven't already done so, please consider nominating the article to appear on the Main Page by posting a nomination at Did you know suggestions. If you do nominate the article for DYK, please cross out the article name on the "Good" articles proposed by bot list. Also, don't forget to keep checking back at Did you know suggestions for comments regarding your nomination. Again, great job on the article. -- Jreferee  (Talk) 02:41, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Copy and paste moves
Please note that moving an article by copying and pasting it, as you did to Body of light is prohibited. See WP:MOVE for how to move an article. In any case, Wikipedia has its own rules on capitalization, and we don't follow the silly practice in occultism of Capitalizing Every Important Word. IPSOS (talk) 16:08, 12 August 2007 (UTC)


 * You object to having it be capitalized, although the term is repeatedly capitalized in the literature? It is a specific name for something, and Wikipedians do care about accuracy and respecting the source. However, if you want to waste your time switching it back to it's prior inaccurate state, go ahead. —Ash (talk) 16:15, 12 August 2007 (UTC)


 * It has to be switched back due to the fact that you copied and pasted. Please read WP:MOVE which explains precisely why this is prohibited. It causes a violation of the GFDL because it loses the edit history of the article and makes it look like you wrote the whole thing. Please don't ever move a page that way again. IPSOS (talk) 16:18, 12 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Oh, and when you refer to "the literature" does all literature on the topic capitalize it that way? I don't think so. Occult texts are well known for overcapitalizing. IPSOS (talk) 16:20, 12 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Okay, I appreciate the move rules. Thanks for pointing it out.


 * Regarding the name, yes, Crowley always capitalized it...it was used as a proper name, not just a description—it was the Body of Light, not a body of light. Believe me, I don't care nearly enough to fight about it...if you feel passionately about it, use whichever name you want. —Ash (talk) 16:54, 12 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, the term is in much wider use than Crowley. The article needs to be globalized anyway. IPSOS (talk) 17:01, 12 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Fair enough. —Ash (talk) 18:44, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Can you please describe some (or all) of your images you put here?
Can you please describe some (or all) of your images you put on this page? The reason why is that I don't really know where you took the images. I try to be as nice as I can, but, I don't know... Thanks! -Goodshoped35110sMy Talk!My Contribs!05:05, 23 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, they were all taken at the location of the article...the Japanese Tea Garden in Golden Gate Park. —Ash (talk) 04:19, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Hello
Ash,

I am a clinical psychologist working on a project to improve imterpersonal communication within the Wikipedia Community. Would you please E-mail me if you would be interested in helping with such a project.

Regards,

Michael David (talk) 22:18, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Survey request
Hi,

I need your help. I am working on a research project at Boston College, studying creation of medical information on Wikipedia. You are being contacted, because you have been identified as an important contributor to one or more articles.

Would you will be willing to answer a few questions about your experience? We've done considerable background research, but we would also like to gather the insight of the actual editors. Details about the project can be found at the user page of the project leader, geraldckane. Survey questions can be found at geraldckane/medsurvey. Your privacy and confidentiality will be strictly protected!

The questions should only take a few minutes. I hope you will be willing to complete the survey, as we do value your insight. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Professor Kane if you have any questions.

Thank You, BCeagle0312 (talk) 01:35, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

sidebar for psychology
Could you please have a look at this. Template_talk:Psychology_sidebar We're still waiting on a RfC for the section on whether "basic science" / "applied science" is appropriate for the side bar compared with "research" / "applied" or some other format. I have problem with this because there are many areas of psychology that don't fit under the first one. Action potential discuss contribs 10:42, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Tony Lema
Thanks for all the pages you created, and the work you've done on articles related to A.C. "Tony" Lema. Great work. I've done quite a bit of edits throughout the whole listings, and have seen some of your travels. Thanks, Aleister Wilson (talk) 14:02, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Armypsytest.jpg
File:Armypsytest.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Armypsytest.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 07:33, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Clinical psychology
I have removed your nomination of clinical psychology from WP:GAN. The article has a cleanup tag (the one requesting a world-wide view) and is thus eligible for quick-failing. Instead of failing the article outright, I'm removing the nomination. Please fix the issue before renomination. Also, please remember to tag the article's talk page with the appropriate templates to finish the GA nomination process. Thanks. Nikki ♥ 311  02:45, 31 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I appreciate your move. I didn't notice the tag for some reason. I'll address it soon... —Ash (talk) 03:42, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Benfranklinstatue.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:12, 30 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Buddhastatuesf.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:21, 1 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Conservatoryfront.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:09, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CIIS seal.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:CIIS seal.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:26, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Image source problem with File:Chaudhuri2.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Chaudhuri2.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:56, 23 March 2018 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 15:56, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Armyalpha.jpg
Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia: You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
 * File:Armyalpha.jpg

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:17, 30 October 2018 (UTC)