User talk:J. Martin Wills

November 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Feng shui, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --  李博杰   | —Talk contribs email 10:44, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of MAE-Central


A tag has been placed on MAE-Central requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Travelbird (talk) 17:32, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

MAE-Central
On the talk page of MAE-Central, you said: Greetings, This article is in reference to some revelent Internet history. The world DOES deserve to have access to the information.

Well, perhaps, but the article contained nothing to indicate any relevant notable history. You are welcome to try again, when you can meet the Notability guidelines.-- SPhilbrick  T  01:31, 18 February 2011 (UTC)