User talk:J.camSP23

Welcome!
Hello, J.camSP23, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Brianda and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 00:46, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

You have an overdue training assignment.
Please complete the assigned training modules. --Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:59, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Peer Review
The article was overall well organized and includes comprehensive overview of the concept, including its definition, historical context, and modern practices that help the readers to understand the topic. I love how you chose this topic of women’s political representation and covers different bias towards woman. I can tell that you have put a lot of effort to touch on the various challenges and criticisms surrounding political representation. Also, by breaking down the topics into specific subtopics helped a lot to read and understand the article. I think the article can be improved by searching for updated resources and embody the topic. ‘Women’s Political Representation’ is such a broad topic that has numerous issues to cover. Since the topic hold so much potential, I expect the article can try approaching specific sections in depth. Overall, the article provides a solid introduction to the topic of political representation and would be useful resource for someone seeking to learn more about this topic.

Kimyeseo1 (talk) 16:47, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Peer Review

 * What is the article's overall status?

Overall, I think your article is in great shape! Your lead provides a clear and concise overview of your page and the topic as a whole. I also think your breakdown of issues makes logical sense and I really like how you incorporated relevant imagery.


 * What are the article's strengths?

I think you’re making an important contribution to the political representation page; the current page provides an overview of different kinds of political representation (descriptive, substantive, etc.), but I think it’s important to have a section that talks about women’s political representation transparently. I also appreciate your topic breakdown, and see lots of room for building upon the outline you have created.


 * How can the article be improved?

I think you could include a more intersectional discussion of women’s political representation. “Women” is very broad category and I think there are a lot of important differences in the political representation of women based on location (which you did a nice job of describing), but it is also is very racialized and I think the experience of non-white women in politics would be another important contribution to the political representation page.


 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

I think your article is solidly developed! I definitely think the sections could be more fleshed out with discussions of supply vs demand factors in representation, but I think as is your article provides a comprehensive overview of the status of women’s representation in politics.

link to full peer review: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xSoLh2MWnrzWxVNNY-yCOqhE-xaZ4brl/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=112155677829801122402&rtpof=true&sd=true

~ Ducksarethebestbird (talk) 07:56, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Political representation
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Political representation, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Qwerfjkl_(bot)&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:34, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
 * A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Political_representation&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1151420243%7CPolitical%20representation%5D%5D Ask for help])