User talk:J.vanderboom

Journal articles
Hi, thanks for contributing journal articles! You can find some tips on improving journal stubs here: WikiProject Academic Journals/Writing guide. I notice that in most of the stubs that you have created, you mention that articles can be accessed on Scopus and Science Direct. Especially the last one (but the first one, too), could be considered by some to be spam. Science Direct is just Elsevier's online platform to provide access to journals. What usually is done is entering a (direct) link to the journal page on Science Direct into the journal infobox (see Behavioural Brain Research, an article that I created a while ago). It is also useful to mention that journals are covered by the Science Citation Index. Not mentioning this kind of information means that you will risk deletion of the article. You have reverted my changes to Artificial Intelligence (journal) a few times, but believe me, I am only trying to help and make the article more in accordance with WP guidelines. I'll do this again and hope you will not revert me again. This time I'll leave in the 5-year IF, although this is something mentioned in almost no journal article (and as far as I know, not currently a popular statistic). Hope this explains why I have been reverting you. Happy editing! --Crusio (talk) 16:02, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * PS: I just noticed that one of the reversions that I mentioned above was initiated by an anonymous IP, 145.36.63.11, and then completed a minute later by you. That IP traces to Elsevier. If you work for Elsevier, you have a conflict of interest and should be very careful, because something like that can get you blocked. If you indeed work for Elseveir, what you can do is whenever you edit an article related to Elsevier or on a journal published by them, drop me a note and I'll check it for neutrality, so that you remain on the safe side of WP policy. Of course, if you have nothing to do with Elsevier and this was all just a coincidence, then this is not necessary. --Crusio (talk) 16:12, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi again, I left a lengthy response on my talk page. It may help you save some of the image files that you just uploaded. In addition, I don't think that the external links you are adding are a good idea. Those that are directly related to the journals are already in the infoboxes. Those to the more general Elsevier RSS feeds could be regarded as spam. I think you should take them out. Also, the ISSN belongs in the infobox, it is not an external link. Cheers! --Crusio (talk) 13:52, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I've had a look at the latest changes that you made and most looks pretty good! One thing about the external links: apparently I was wrong about these: a link to the journal home page is acceptable and appropriate as an external link. Shows I don't know all! (No surprise there :-) Groeten en beste wensen voor 2010. --Crusio (talk) 13:52, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * it fact, its essential. It goes there even if it is also in the infobox. Why we duplicate so much from the infobox is a little hard to explain, but they were a later addition.    DGG ( talk ) 05:21, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Blue_hills.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Blue_hills.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:41, 12 January 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Closedmouth (talk) 11:41, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Aijournalcover.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Aijournalcover.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:19, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Dataknowledgeengineering.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Dataknowledgeengineering.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 14:35, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Neuronet.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Neuronet.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:25, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Neurocom.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Neurocom.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:25, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Theoreticalcs.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Theoreticalcs.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:26, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Websemjournalcover.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Websemjournalcover.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:26, 24 June 2012 (UTC)