User talk:J5Locklear

Nomination of Damon S. Davis for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Damon S. Davis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Damon S. Davis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &mdash; O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  16:34, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Damon S. Davis


A tag has been placed on Damon S. Davis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Linguist talk&#124; contribs 06:49, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Damon S. Davis


A tag has been placed on Draft:Damon S. Davis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Linguist talk&#124; contribs 13:10, 15 June 2017 (UTC)


 * If I may add to this, I'm not an administrator so I can't delete any pages myself - I can only nominate them for deletion. An admin or other user may disagree with me and remove the tag. However, judging from the way you've written the article and draft, you may have a conflict of interest, if you are or have an external relationship with Davis, and may find it difficult to write about him in a neutral way. I'd recommend you read WP:CCPOL, WP:NPOV, WP:SPAM and WP:PEACOCK (along with WP:COI and WP:DISCLOSE if you are affiliated with Davis). If you do have a conflict of interest, I think you're probably better off not writing about him and instead leaving it to someone with no connection to him to create an article for him. Thank you. Linguist talk&#124; contribs  13:20, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Seconded. I'm defintely in agreement with ; as this page testifies, you have made plenty of other attempts at creating a page for this gent, so it is actually slightly disingenuous to claim- as you do here- that 'it came to [your] attention that Mr. Davis did not have wikipedia page.' That may have originally been the case, but you have been told twice now that the material is unsuitable and yet persist in re-adding it. Cheers! &mdash;  O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  13:33, 15 June 2017 (UTC)