User talk:J786m

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sattari Jame Mosque (August 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SportingFlyer were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sattari Jame Mosque and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sattari Jame Mosque, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sattari_Jame_Mosque Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SportingFlyer&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sattari_Jame_Mosque reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer  talk  00:35, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sattari Jame Mosque (August 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ProgrammingGeek was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sattari Jame Mosque and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sattari Jame Mosque, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sattari_Jame_Mosque Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ProgrammingGeek&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sattari_Jame_Mosque reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Programming Geek talk to me 16:25, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Use of more than one account
It looks as though you are using two or more accounts. What is more, there have been edits from more than one account to the same page, which is likely to mislead other editors into thinking that the edits were made by more than one person. To avoid such confusion, and also to avoid the risk that other editors may get the impression that yo are trying to be deceptive, it is much better to stick to one account unless there are strong reasons for not doing so, in which case you should post clear statements from both accounts stating that they are run by the same person. Even if you do that, avoid using more than one account to edit the same page, or on different pages in connection with the same thing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:45, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Use of the "Articles for creation" system
The purpose of having drafts which can be submitted as articles for creation is to help new editors to avoid deletion of new articles they create, by getting help from experienced editors who have a better idea what is likely to be considered acceptable. It is not advisable for an inexperienced editor to ignore the advice of three different experienced editors who think a draft is not suitable, and go ahead and move the draft to an article, because the most likely effect of doing so is that the new article will get deleted very quickly. The draft which you moved is still nowhere near ready to be an article, so I have moved it back to draft space to help you avoid deletion. I strongly advise you not to move it yourself again. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:54, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

I see that you have now submitted the same draft five times without making any changes at all to try to address the reason for rejection, which is lack of sourcing. Continually resubmitting the same draft without any attempt to address the reason for rejection achieves no useful purpose, and takes up reviewers' time which could be more usefully employed on other work. If you do the same again it is likely that you will be blocked from editing to prevent further waste of other editors' time. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:04, 30 August 2018 (UTC)