User talk:JACOBITEEDITOR

I refer you to the comments on the Talk page of user REGENT123456 regarding ‘Managing a conflict of interest’ and ‘Wikipedia policy on editing using more than one account’. Sweet6970 (talk) 13:21, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Richard Keen, Baron Keen of Elie, you may be blocked from editing. BusterD (talk) 15:04, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of &#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/RUSTINGTON. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Girth Summit  (blether) 10:50, 14 August 2022 (UTC)


 * {{unblock|reason=THE LAST EDIT MADE UNDER REFERENCE TO SECTION 6 OF THE 1974 ACT WAS ENTIRELY ACCURATE. WHY HAS IT BEEN REMOVED / REVERTED AND THE ACCOUNT BLOCKED? JACOBITEEDITOR (talk) 14:16, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
 * The above unblock request is improperly formatted, and will not be picked up by anybody. However, there would be no point in me trying to fix the technical issues, because it is not a valid unblock request.
 * With regards to the act you mention, I have no view on the legal position; as an administrator here, my mandate is to enforce the English-language Wikipedia's policies. You are blocked because you have been abusively using multiple accounts (see WP:SOCK) to engage in an edit war (see WP:EW). That is not acceptable here; if you wish to edit our articles, you will need to read WP:GAB, and make a proper unblock request. You may also wish to familiarise yourself with the guidance at WP:NLT; I do not assert that you are in breach of that, but it is worth knowing about. Best Girth Summit  (blether)  16:38, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
 * OK, so I see you have tried creating another account to get around the block I placed on the last few. That will not work, please stop trying. You have also tried using legal arguments in your edit summaries while using that account. That will also not work. Wikipedia editors are not lawyers; it is not reasonable to expect them to be able to make decisions based on legal arguments. Remember that this project covers subjects in jurisdictions across the entire world (not just the English-speaking world); you cannot reasonably expect our editors to be au fait with the law of every land, or to engage in debates about such laws. We base decisions about our content on our policies and guidelines, which we believe comply with the laws we are required to follow. If you want to contribute to this project, you need to be willing to abide by those policies and guidelines - that means no sock puppetry, no editing with an undisclosed conflict of interest, and no edit warring. If you are willing to abide by those restrictions, and to use talk pages to discuss content issues with other editors, and to abide by the consensus decisions arising from those discussions, then you should request unblock after reading WP:GAB. If you wish to pursue legal channels, you are of course at liberty to do that, but you are not permitted to edit this project while doing so. The Wikipedia Foundation's legal team can be contacted at legal@wikimedia.org. Best Girth Summit  (blether)  01:22, 15 August 2022 (UTC)