User talk:JAMMER77777

October 2018
This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Kings Food Markets, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''You have inserted the same unencyclopedic, derogatory paragraph well over three times, under this user name and presumably IPs 173.241.189.73 and 67.86.216.225. Among other issues, this is a violation of the 3 revert rule. You have not tried to discuss on the talk page. Please stop.'' David Brooks (talk) 11:58, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

I am placing true information that keeps getting deleted. I stand by what I wrote — Preceding unsigned comment added by JAMMER77777 (talk • contribs)
 * Thank you for responding. A basic tenet of Wikipedia is that merely being true is not sufficient grounds for inclusion. A fact must be verifiable and encyclopedic. For a readable summary, see the essay But it's true!. The fundamental policies, but a longer read, are Verifiability and No original research. The idea of encyclopedic is less formal, but is intended to exclude ephemeral trivia; in addition, disparaging personal remarks are discouraged. I hope this helps you understand the deletions. David Brooks (talk) 17:16, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Dave, I understand what you wrote, but nothing I added was disparaging, or attacking anyone personally in any way. I am familiar with some of the key management personnel of this company, and This Knowledge is encyclopedic and important in an article about this company. I did not intend in any way to disparage anyone, and in fact, my additions were quite complimentary to the individuals mentioned.
 * I appreciate your replying, but you haven't addressed my main point. I think it would be helpful to read the essay and the policies; also, given what you say, look at No original research. Thanks. David Brooks (talk) 17:33, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi Dave. I skimmed through those articles as they were rather long. Again, I don't think there is very much controversial about listing a few key members of their corporate management, and a complimentary word or 2 about some innovate policies they have developed.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Hut 8.5  20:41, 22 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Since apparently all you're interested in doing here is adding this inappropriate content I've blocked you from editing.  Hut 8.5  20:43, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Since you asked
Please read Administrators--
 * Requests for adminship/Dlohcierekim,
 * Requests for adminship/331dot,
 * Requests for adminship/Hut 8.5

again, in no particular or.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 02:54, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

LOL, nobody freaking cares that some computer nerds got a little "honorary" title LOL. In WIKI, there are no administrators. Everyone and their cousin is an administrator because anyone can do anything.
 * Well, actually my knowledge of computers falls quite short of what would qualify someone as a "nerd". I do have three extra buttons, though. And the title is far from honorary; it means I decide whether or not to unblock you. (one of the aforementioned buttons, you know.) Guess how I've decided? At any rate, please read the WP:GAB. There are still alternatives for you if no geeky nerds decide to unblock you.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 04:00, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
 * It is true that all users are "equal", but it is not true that "anyone can do anything" The community has chosen to give some "buttons" to a limited number of trusted users as it would be irresponsible and chaotic to allow all users(for example) to block and unblock users, or to delete pages.   331dot (talk) 10:11, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 06:17, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 19:31, 29 October 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 07:18, 30 October 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 19:38, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I have rev-deleted the offending edits under WP:RD2, as they were clearly derogatory accusations against named individuals. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:38, 29 October 2018 (UTC)