User talk:JAMillerKC

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia!

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 20:52, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Based on your contributions so far, it's likely you may or may not be connected, such as an employee or similar, and if so, please see Terms of Use WP:Paid. SwisterTwister   talk  00:01, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Query
Hi, I'm wondering if you may be affiliated with the subjects whose articles you've edited. If you could let me know, that would be great! K.e.coffman (talk) 05:11, 3 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Hello K.e.coffman, no I am not. That would be WP:COI. I wish I had famous friends. Thanks for asking!--JAMillerKC (talk) 14:58, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, is your above answer to K.e.coffman's question still true as of today? (It would be valuable to know with respect to your edits in e.g. Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton or Todd Boehly.) Thanks! Regards, HaeB (talk) 02:45, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello HaeB, yes it is. And it will be true tomorrow, but thanks for asking.--JAMillerKC (talk) 03:09, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I share the same concerns. It would be an extremely good idea to work on articles and content where your editing won't appear promotional in any way. --Ronz (talk) 18:21, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

TheRichest.com as a source
Hi JAMillerKC. I noticed that you used therichest.com as a source for biographical information in Ryan Howard. Please note that the general consensus as expressed at WP:RSN is that therichest.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks.--Ronz (talk) 18:26, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
 * My apologies, Ronz, I failed to realize they were on the list.--JAMillerKC (talk) 18:28, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
 * There's no "list". It would be a good idea to avoid WP:BLP content completely until you are more familiar with what are and are not considered reliable sources. WP:BLP requires high quality sources and strict adherence to all Wikipedia content policies. --Ronz (talk) 18:33, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited W. W. Grainger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SEC. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:33, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:OnceaMetro&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/OnceaMetro. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. GeneralNotability (talk) 00:32, 19 May 2021 (UTC)