User talk:JARA7979

Talkback
Oda Mari (talk) 17:04, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Blocked

 * Indeed you tried to discuss, however, at the same time you also edit-warred to remove referenced information. Can you explain me how are you going to resolve content disputes in the future if unblocked? Max Semenik (talk) 17:57, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * If my opinion on the problem is taken in the debate with Oda Mari with whom I had main discussion, I will edit the relevant paragraph in Joseon based on my opinion. When there is any problem even after that, there will be discussion in the debate for Joseon or on my page. JARA7979 (talk) 14:11, 3 February 2014 (KTC)}}
 * Your opinion on Wikipedia is irrelevant. reliable sources are key.  If you intend to edit based on your opinion, then this is not the project for you.  You will also note this key, simple process - if you make an edit and it's reverted, you may never make the same edit until you have obtained new consensus for it via discussion on the article talkpage.  In other words, discuss first  D  P  14:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Then how should I do from now on? How can I lift the blockade? JARA7979 (talk) 23:05, 10 February 2014 (KTC)}}
 * Blocks are intended to protect the project from similar future behaviours. You need to provide assurances that you fully understand WP:5P, and every single policy or guideline that has been provided to you above.  You need to explain how you now understand, and how you will apply them in the future.  Admins need to be able to be assured that you will NEVER edit according to your opinion, only reporting what sources say.  You have a lot of reading - and then a lot of writing/convincing to do.  It's rather obvious that you were mistaken about Wikipedia - it's an encyclopedia, not a place for person opinion, discussion, or research.  You may even decide after fully-comprehending the purpose of the project, that you don't desire to edit.  If you do choose to continue, again, prove to us that you understand the policies and show us how you intend to move forward accordingly  D  P  10:12, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I understand the circumstances above and 1. I admit that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and be sure to retitle dependable informations. 2. I will always stay in neutral perspective. 3. I will respect other users and be careful there are no conflicts happening. 4. I will obey copyright. 5. I will use Wikipedia obeying the WP:5P. 6. After this blocked is lifted, if such situations like conflict between the users happen, I will settle the dispute together by debating with others. JARA7979 (talk) 16:00, 21 February 2014 (KTC)}}

April 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Joseon, you may be blocked from editing. ''Please do not remove sourced material. '' Oda Mari (talk) 15:42, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

I request you to provide reference in Battle of busan(1592) for edition.
As I heard from the record that the actual Japanese casualties in Battle of busan is approximately 8000. I tried to change it in Battle of busan(1592) but Oda Mari is keep turning back the edit reasoning that I do not have any references. I lack the ability to put reference on text. Can you do it for me? Every other country's Wikipedia says they have approximately 8000 casualties. So I request to you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heeyoong (talk • contribs) 10:54, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

I understood most of the story. When I see your nickname, I think you are Korean. Is it possible to talk in korean here? --JARA7979 (talk) 11:25, 5 may 2014 (KTC)

Probably talking in Korean is not recommended in WIKIPEDIA ENGLISH, so I ask for talking in English even I'm not fully expert in english.
Can you find the record of Battle of busan(1592) in Joseon Dynasty's annals and add it please? I heard that Japanese claim it is their victory but I think since both sides are claiming victory, it's result have to be said in 'Inconclusive'. Can you find it in Joseon dynasty's annals and change it please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heeyoong (talk • contribs) 11:29, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

I will request you the treaty of 1712(territorial dispute between Chosun and Qing) to refute Oda Mari.
In 1712(Sukjong 38) there was Mountain Baekdu's memorial stone to clearly state borderline between Chosun and Qing. Called Baekdusan Geounggebi in Korean.

Say to Oda Mari that If chosun was tribute,did we need this?

I will support you. Dont give up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lerike (talk • contribs) 07:56, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

And also tell why only Joseon and Goryeo are mainly informed as tribute in intro bar.
There were so many countries who had been tribute of Mongol and Ming Ching dynasty but Oda Mari is just commenting this on Chosun and Goryeo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lerike (talk • contribs) 08:05, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

And highlight that this information is redundant and hugely useless repetition.
It is mentioned on text several times and chardlesch also agreeded on it. Discuss it to administrators that he is refuting other's opinion as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lerike (talk • contribs) 08:15, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Also please contact me ASAP
THANK YOU — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lerike (talk • contribs) 08:46, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Joseon. Oda Mari (talk) 16:07, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 17:40, 17 October 2014 (UTC)