User talk:JASpencer/Archive 8

Proposed deletion of Benedictional


The article Benedictional has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. rsjaffe talk  23:41, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Votive office


The article Votive office has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. rsjaffe talk  23:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Indult Catholic for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Indult Catholic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Indult Catholic& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Veverve (talk) 21:06, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

"Definitions, Theological" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Definitions, Theological and has thus listed it at redirects for discussion. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 24 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 16:32, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

"Medicine and Canon Law" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Medicine and Canon Law and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 01:35, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

"Consent (in Canon Law)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Consent (in Canon Law) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 01:37, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

"Compromise (in Canon Law)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Compromise (in Canon Law) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 01:39, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

"Indult Catholic" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Indult Catholic and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 21 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 15:46, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hugh Rossi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adam Butler.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Left Democratic Front (Maharashtra) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Left Democratic Front (Maharashtra) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Left Democratic Front (Maharashtra) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 09:22, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

"Bigamy (in Canon Law)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Bigamy (in Canon Law) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 12 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 12:51, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Will and testament of clerics for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Will and testament of clerics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Will and testament of clerics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Veverve (talk) 12:54, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

"Consanguinity (in Canon Law)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Consanguinity (in Canon Law) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 12 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 13:06, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

"Bigamy (in Civil Law)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Bigamy (in Civil Law) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 19 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 13:49, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Military ranks in the Bible for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Military ranks in the Bible is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Military ranks in the Bible until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ★Trekker (talk) 01:22, 9 April 2022 (UTC)