User talk:JASpencer/Archive 9

Nomination of Dundee in the 1922 general election for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dundee in the 1922 general election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dundee in the 1922 general election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  NGS  Shakin' All Over 19:56, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Redirect nomination
Hi there. I have nominated the redirect Middlesborough in the 2010 general election for deletion. I hope you don't mind, and I am not sure it matters that much anyway. But, to be absolutely clear, what I think we should consider deleting is the misspelt version of Middlesbrough – I have no quarrel with the correctly-spelt Middlesbrough in the 2010 general election (which I moved there) and its redirect to ToryBoy The Movie. It's only the now-redundant one with "Middlesborough" whose deletion I think should be considered. I'm letting you know because the system doesn't seem to have warned you, possibly because (for some reason I don't follow) it doesn't think you created it!

Anyway, I hope this makes some kind of sense. Thank you for pointing out the existence of the film, which sounds quite interesting and I should maybe watch! Thanks and all good wishes DBaK (talk) 11:53, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Not a problem. Sorry for the misspelling. JASpencer (talk) 17:50, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * No worries and many thanks for the reply. Cheers DBaK (talk) 21:14, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

ds alert balkans
NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 01:49, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Crimea categories

 * Generally, its a good idea to wait for a consensus to form before implementing changes under discussion. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 19:19, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, sorry. I just thought it was so much better as a name for the category (which although it deserves a category, I wasn't keen on the name I gave it). JASpencer (talk) 19:27, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Entities controlling Crimea


A tag has been placed on Category:Entities controlling Crimea indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 23:49, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Church of Saint Pancras (Lucca)
Hello, JASpencer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Church of Saint Pancras (Lucca), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Category:Historical governments of Crimea has been nominated for renaming
Category:Historical governments of Crimea has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:48, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Republic of Crimea (1992–1995)
Am trying to integrate your new article with existing ones on Crimea. Exemplary source citations.

Avica1998 (talk) 02:48, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

FYI: UNHCR 	Minorities at Risk Project, Chronology for Crimean Russians in Ukraine, 2004, available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/469f38ec2.html [accessed 10 July 2022] Avica1998 (talk) 19:35, 10 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you. Although I've used this source, I'm a bit wary of its reliability as I'm not sure of refworld's provenance (although it claims to be a copy of a UNHCR document) and it can make claims that aren't obvious in other sources.  When I'm happier with it I'll be happy to use it more extensively. JASpencer (talk) 19:40, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I liked the internal politics section: it was distinctive. I am sorry to see it cut. Avica1998 (talk) 00:15, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Too many citation requests, reasonably as these were crammed down from a few more general articles like History of Crimea. I will slowly work through them.  JASpencer (talk) 07:30, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Jacques Mitterrand for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jacques Mitterrand is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jacques Mitterrand until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Rathfelder (talk) 22:04, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Campaign for an Independent Britain for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Campaign for an Independent Britain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Campaign for an Independent Britain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Jtrrs0 (talk) 19:14, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

"Thomas Louis Green" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Thomas Louis Green and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 27 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:32, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Notes from main page
Reference_desk/Archives/Humanities/2015_July_24

https://ia600301.us.archive.org/11/items/constitutionaly07unkngoog/constitutionaly07unkngoog.pdf page 139+

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ah2vCwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=British+Parliamentary+Election+Results+1885-1918&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiVh8y5sMDMAhVL1ywKHeFdBBEQ6AEIJjAA#v=onepage&q&f=false

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=MMCuCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA254&dq=f.w.Goldstone+H.Greenwood&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjZ8vfEprvMAhWHuBQKHSo2DboQ6AEIHTAA#v=onepage&q&f=false JASpencer (talk) 21:03, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hi JASpencer! I noticed that you recently added or changed citations&#32;on Shropshire (UK Parliament constituency) that caused an error in a citation template. This error has been fixed by others, but in future please verify that citations do not contain errors before publishing your edit. Thank you. Fun Is Optional (talk) 12:02, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Cherry
https://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/volume/1820-1832/member/cherry-george-1793-1848 Xx236 (talk) 11:19, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Category:Parliamentary elections in Ipswich


The page Category:Parliamentary elections in Ipswich has been deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:
 * The category had been empty for seven days or more and it was not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories. (See section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review. Liz Read! Talk! 04:50, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:By-elections to the Parliament of England in Ipswich


A tag has been placed on Category:By-elections to the Parliament of England in Ipswich indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:04, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, JASpencer!


Happy New Year! JASpencer, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See this for background context.

— Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 17:03, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 17:03, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

"William A Whalen" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect William A Whalen and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 08:19, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

"Civil Incorporation of Church Property" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Civil Incorporation of Church Property and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 12:27, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

"Incorporation of Church Property, Civil" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Incorporation of Church Property, Civil and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 12:27, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Category:Members of Propaganda Due has been nominated for renaming
Category:Members of Propaganda Due has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. HadesTTW (he/him • talk) 19:51, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

"Donation (in Canon Law)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Donation_(in_Canon_Law)&redirect=no Donation (in Canon Law)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 12:22, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

"Eucharist, Introduction to the" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eucharist,_Introduction_to_the&redirect=no Eucharist, Introduction to the] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 22:59, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

"Introduction to the Eucharist" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Introduction_to_the_Eucharist&redirect=no Introduction to the Eucharist] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 22:59, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

"As a Sacrifice Eucharist" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=As_a_Sacrifice_Eucharist&redirect=no As a Sacrifice Eucharist] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 23:04, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

"Eucharist, as a Sacrifice" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eucharist,_as_a_Sacrifice&redirect=no Eucharist, as a Sacrifice] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 23:40, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

"Mass, Sacrifice of the" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mass,_Sacrifice_of_the&redirect=no Mass, Sacrifice of the] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 23:40, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

"Marriage, Moral and Canonical Aspect of" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marriage,_Moral_and_Canonical_Aspect_of&redirect=no Marriage, Moral and Canonical Aspect of] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 12:24, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

"Moral and Canonical Aspect of Marriage" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moral_and_Canonical_Aspect_of_Marriage&redirect=no Moral and Canonical Aspect of Marriage] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 12:24, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

"Relation of the Universe to God" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Relation_of_the_Universe_to_God&redirect=no Relation of the Universe to God] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 01:00, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Articles with Large Article Page Character Count related to WikiProject Northern Ireland
This is a list of articles from WikiProject Northern Ireland with a large article page character count. For more information, visit the project page: WikiProject Northern Ireland List of articles: * 1st Battalion, Ulster Defence Regiment (Character Count: 9610) * 3rd Battalion, Ulster Defence Regiment (Character Count: 10866) * 4th Battalion, Ulster Defence Regiment (Character Count: 6797) * 7th Battalion, Ulster Defence Regiment (Character Count: 5596) * 8th Battalion, Ulster Defence Regiment (Character Count: 5030) * 8th Infantry Brigade (United Kingdom) (Character Count: 7795) * 9th Battalion, Ulster Defence Regiment (Character Count: 5203) * 10th Battalion, Ulster Defence Regiment (Character Count: 5160) * 86th (Royal County Down) Regiment of Foot (Character Count: 10717) * 525th (Antrim) Coast Regiment, Royal Artillery (Character Count: 8195) JASpencer (talk) 07:15, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Lists of species
Hi, the convention here is that when a genus has so many species that including the list in the article would make it too long, the list is at "List of GENUS species". It doesn't have a taxobox. See Category:Lists of species for examples. Also we would not have articles on varieties or forms (unless they were especially notable, which is highly unlikely for diatoms), so they should certainly not be wikilinked if included in the list, but lists of infraspecies would be more usually included in the relevant species article, I think. Peter coxhead (talk) 18:28, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

"Grace, Controversies on" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Grace,_Controversies_on&redirect=no Grace, Controversies on] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 00:22, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

"Controversies on Grace" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Controversies_on_Grace&redirect=no Controversies on Grace] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 00:26, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cambridge University by-election, 1887


A tag has been placed on Cambridge University by-election, 1887 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 14:06, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pontefract by-election, 1893


A tag has been placed on Pontefract by-election, 1893 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 16:09, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of North East Cork by-election, 1893


A tag has been placed on North East Cork by-election, 1893 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 16:44, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of City of London by-election, 1891


A tag has been placed on City of London by-election, 1891 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 16:45, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

"Declaration of the Nullity of the Ecône Schism" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Declaration_of_the_Nullity_of_the_Ec%C3%B4ne_Schism&redirect=no Declaration of the Nullity of the Ecône Schism] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 06:49, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

"Of Saint Matthew" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Of_Saint_Matthew&redirect=no Of Saint Matthew] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 07:10, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

"Matthew, Gospel of Saint" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Matthew,_Gospel_of_Saint&redirect=no Matthew, Gospel of Saint] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 07:11, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

"Mark, Gospel of" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mark,_Gospel_of&redirect=no Mark, Gospel of] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 07:13, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

"Luke, Gospel of Saint" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Luke,_Gospel_of_Saint&redirect=no Luke, Gospel of Saint] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 07:14, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Will and testament of clerics for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Will and testament of clerics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Will and testament of clerics (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Metropolitan90 (talk) 23:37, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Prince of Lampedusa
Would you have a look at this (and its talk page)? I realize it's been a decade but there are no citations, and you made a statement that I think is just plain wrong. - Jmabel &#124; Talk 03:16, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

"Mass, Nuptial" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mass,_Nuptial&redirect=no Mass, Nuptial] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 22:09, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Easton Historic District
Hello Thank you for looking at Easton Historic District (Easton, Maryland). I noticed you upgraded it to Start class. Any thoughts on how to improve it to GA? TwoScars (talk) 19:30, 29 June 2023 (UTC)


 * No problem @TwoScars. I'd suggest going to the project(s) that this article goes to and ask for suggestions.  Probably talk about moving it up to C class, then B Class, etc.. JASpencer (talk) 20:00, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Frequent Communion


The article Frequent Communion has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No need for an article on 'doing X frequently', in general, and 'frequent communion' isn't any kind of specialized term of art -- it genuinely just means 'taking communion frequently'."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Moriwen (talk) 15:05, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Ogilvy, 1st Lord Banff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Aberdeen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chronicle of Huntingdon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Papal conclave
Papal conclave has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Phlsph7 (talk) 11:28, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of ministers for education in Victoria


The article List of ministers for education in Victoria has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Pages were unnecessarily separated (see Minister_for_Education_(Victoria))"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ––– GMH MELBOURNE   TALK  00:23, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of ministers for health in Victoria


The article List of ministers for health in Victoria has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "To undo unnecessary separation. See (Minister for Health (Victoria))"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ––– GMH MELBOURNE   TALK  00:32, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of ministers of agriculture of Victoria


The article List of ministers of agriculture of Victoria has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "To undo unnecessary separation (see Minister for Agriculture (Victoria))"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ––– GMH MELBOURNE   TALK  00:38, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of List of ministers of agriculture of Victoria for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of ministers of agriculture of Victoria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of ministers of agriculture of Victoria until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. ––– GMH MELBOURNE   TALK  08:35, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of List of ministers for health in Victoria for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of ministers for health in Victoria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of ministers for health in Victoria until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. ––– GMH MELBOURNE   TALK  08:38, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of List of ministers for education in Victoria for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of ministers for education in Victoria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of ministers for education in Victoria until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. ––– GMH MELBOURNE   TALK  08:40, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Category:Armenian Catholic priests has been nominated for renaming
Category:Armenian Catholic priests has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:18, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Category:Unopposed by-elections to the Parliament of the United Kingdom in Liverpool constituencies has been nominated for merging
Category:Unopposed by-elections to the Parliament of the United Kingdom in Liverpool constituencies has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. LukeSurlt c 14:54, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:By-elections to the Parliament of the United Kingdom in Hackney constituencies has been nominated for merging
Category:By-elections to the Parliament of the United Kingdom in Hackney constituencies has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. LukeSurlt c 14:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:20th century by-elections to the Parliament of the United Kingdom in Suffolk constituencies has been nominated for merging
Category:20th century by-elections to the Parliament of the United Kingdom in Suffolk constituencies has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. LukeSurlt c 15:03, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:19th century by-elections to the Parliament of the United Kingdom in Suffolk constituencies has been nominated for merging
Category:19th century by-elections to the Parliament of the United Kingdom in Suffolk constituencies has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. LukeSurlt c 15:03, 25 January 2024 (UTC)