User talk:JB667

August 2012
Hello, I'm Davejohnsan. This might not have been intentional, but I noticed that you recently removed some content from Homeopathy without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Davejohnsan (talk) 19:12, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Homeopathy, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Please do not remove sourced content, regardless of your contrary views. MrX 21:22, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Homeopathy, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 21:27, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Homeopathy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Theroadislong (talk) 21:55, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Homeopathy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Do not remove cited content without getting consensus from other editors on the article's talk page. Please read the helpful links under the purple header up there ^ before editing this article again.'' MrX 21:58, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:47, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
MrX 22:49, 1 August 2012 (UTC)