User talk:JBA007

June 2022
Hello, I'm Peaceray. I noticed that you recently removed content from Paul Thomas Anderson without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Your edit summary, "Removed unrelated content", is an insufficient explanation as to why you were removing content about Anderson. If you do not believe it belongs in the article, as WP:BRD suggests, please discuss first on the talk page. As WP:VNT says in a nutshell: Editors may not add content solely because they believe it is true, nor delete content they believe to be untrue, unless they have verified beforehand with a reliable source.'' Peaceray (talk) 17:44, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Paul Thomas Anderson, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. lol1 VNIO ( I made a mistake?  talk to me  &#8226; contribs) 18:04, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Paul Thomas Anderson, you may be blocked from editing. ''As per WP:BRD suggests, I have invited you by edit summary & by notice to participate in a disussion on the talk page. That is located at Talk:Paul Thomas Anderson. You have ignored warnings from lol1VNIO & myself & have removed cited material without sufficient explanation. Please get consensus on the talk page before you make these changes. Failing to do so & proceeding to engage in an edit war will merely get you blocked. Really, we want you to be a colloborative editor. To do that, you must be willing to participate in a disussion about these changes.'' Peaceray (talk) 20:33, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Francis Ford Coppola filmography. Peaceray (talk) 20:37, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Mani Ratnam, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Peaceray (talk) 04:05, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 17:01, 10 June 2022 (UTC)