User talk:JBWM

Unspecified source for Image:ZORK.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ZORK.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:25, 7 January 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:25, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Zork
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Several editors have commented on the unencyclopedic and advertising tone of the Zork section. This is a problem, in addition to it being unreferenced. I noticed that all your edits to Wikipedia seem singularly focused on Zork and it is possible that you may have a conflict of interest with the subject matter. I would recommend that you bring up desired edits on the Talk:Alternative wine closures page for discussion rather than just re-adding them. There can probably be a compromise middle ground between the current text and some of the information that you would like to see in the article. Another current problem with the section is the lack of reliable sources. Finding an independent, third party source for your edits would certainly help their case for inclusion. AgneCheese/Wine 06:26, 8 January 2008 (UTC)