User talk:JBYORK

Fellatio
In regards to your recent edits to Fellatio and Talk:Fellatio: please review WP:TPG in regards to this edit. Please see WP:POINT in regards to this series of three edits by you. Please see WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA in regards to this edit, which contained the following comments: "you are victimizing women by denyig them the right to be represented as what they are: cock-suckers." and "No matter what you do, you are not gonna stuff this down anyone's throat, even though that is what you prefer to do."  Joie de Vivre 21:25, 12 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The above is out of context. JBYORK 23:32, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Talk page guidelines
Please review WP:TPG, which clearly explains that new comments are to be added in the format of a threaded discussion. Your interjected comment goes against the recommended format. Reverting attempts to correct the error is even less productive. Joie de Vivre 23:47, 12 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The above is out of context and part of the continued arbitrary harrasment of a new user by a low-level wiki-beaurocrat. JBYORK 23:52, 12 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Dude I've met much worse then Joie de Vivre on this here site. He is just that, a low leval beurocrat, a member of the fascist wing of Wikipedia. There are much worse on the Obama talk page. There is a disturbing gay agenda on articles like fellatio. Manic Hispanic 00:04, 13 June 2007 (UTC)


 * This was a response to your multiple reverts. Rather than "harrassing" you, I avoided directly contacting you for several edits, but you would not stop reverting until I came directly to you to explain what I meant in my original edit summary.  Joie de Vivre 00:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC)


 * But you are so hostile when disagreed with, evade logic and name-call when cornered, and then ignore when asked to defend actions. JBYORK 00:08, 13 June 2007 (UTC)


 * What name(s) did I call you? Joie de Vivre 00:15, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Heterosexual Fallatio
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Also, fellatio only has one "a." Exploding Boy 18:14, 21 June 2007 (UTC)


 * What is wrong with such an article? What is this war against normative (read: reproductive) sexual behavior? 67.87.92.56 18:23, 21 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Fellatio is reproductive? Wow, you learn something every day.  Joie de Vivre T 18:25, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

The Fellatio article covers the act in sufficient detail. There is no difference between fellatio performed by a man and fellatio performed by a woman. It is the same act. The article "Heterosexual Fallatio," besides being improperly spelled, was original research (actually, just nonsense). The warning not to recreate that page applies to everyone equally. Exploding Boy 18:35, 21 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Uh, of course there is a difference. One is done as related to procreative-sex; the other is not procreative sex, rather by self-obsessed homosexual deviants.  My goodness, must the obvious be spelled out?  JBYORK 17:38, 25 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Unless there's some new way of impregnating a human female via her mouth, then fellatio is not related to procreative sex, no matter who is giving or receiving, their genders or their sexualities. In addition, your personal views on homosexuality have no bearing on any article on Wikipedia.  Hope this clears up any confusion.  Exploding Boy 17:48, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Article talk pages
I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, talk pages are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or off-topic observations. Please refrain from doing this in the future. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Exploding Boy 17:50, 25 June 2007 (UTC)