User talk:JBeardsley

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Nsaa (talk) 15:51, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Wikipedia Vandalism
JBeardsley, your edits of the Modern Whig Party were changed because it is clear that you engaged in Wiki vandalism. Do not do that again. Aardvark31 (talk) 12:58, 31 August 2008 (UTC) JBeardsley, your edits of the Modern Whig Party were AGAIN changed because it is clear that you engaged in Wiki vandalism. You have been reported. Do not do that again. Aardvark31 (talk) 12:58, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Once again, you have been reported for your vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aardvark31 (talk • contribs) 14:58, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

My attempts to post were fully substantiated by the ModernWhig.org/issues.html their own page which, unlike any other American Party, advocates Israeli settlement of the West Bank. You call it vandalism to restate the Modern Whigs' own platform! JBeardsley (talk) 16:46, 31 August 2008 (UTC)JBardsley

You cannot pick one minor element and spout a debatable opinion without mention to the bulk of the other relevant information. It also is known that you have diseminated a blatantly anti-Semitic email throughout the political arena on behalf of a known bigoted organization per citation. Your motives are wrong and your statements are wrong. Don't vandalize again. Aardvark31 (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 21:51, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Hovercraft
I assume that you are a descendant of Melville W. Beardsley and that you created http://www.geneabase.com/acv/acv.htm. I therefore did not slap a db-copyvio notice on the article and a nothanks-sd message here. But a US newspaper article from 1960 is still under copyright and a very large quote such as yours would be a copyvio.

But the real problem, in my view, was that as a new article, it was far too long for the importance of its subject and that it violated Wikipedia's spirit which is that articles should grow organically drawing on the work of multiple editors. The Wikipedia article must of course contain a link to your site, be satisfied with that.

If you have a couple of images which will not violate copyright, do please upload them. -- RHaworth 17:28, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

April 2014
Hello, I'm Jehorn. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Battle of Marks' Mills. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jehorn (talk) 04:06, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

July 2018
Hello. Your recent edit to McDonogh School appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Gab4gab (talk) 11:17, 24 July 2018 (UTC)