User talk:JBfly13

Welcome
 Hello JBfly13, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
 * Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
 * Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help


 * Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[File:Button sig.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

JBfly13, good luck, and have fun. – Aboutmovies (talk) 19:47, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=583937231 your edit] to Rick Lord may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
 * [Category:People from Ingle Wood, California]

Speedy deletion nomination of Phillip Wade


A tag has been placed on Phillip Wade requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. red dog six (talk) 02:50, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Phillip Wade. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. red dog six (talk) 03:10, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chryzinium


The article Chryzinium has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not meet criteria of WP:NFILM. I am unable to find multiple reliable sources discussing this film.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... disco spinster   talk  03:11, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Chryzinium for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chryzinium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Chryzinium until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... disco spinster   talk  03:37, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tim Wade


A tag has been placed on Tim Wade requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:22, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Rick Lord for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rick Lord is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rick Lord until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:31, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Notability
I thought I'd explain why so many of your articles are getting deleted from Wikipedia. The basic reason is that there is no coverage in reliable sources (WP:RS) to show that any of the people or the film is notable. By RS I mean that you have coverage in places such as the news or on film related websites such as CinemaBlend. IMDb is good for backing up trivial data (WP:TRIVIAL), but it cannot show notability at all. It just shows that the subject matter exists in some form or fashion. On that same note, saying that someone has worked with notable persons does not give notability either. (WP:NOTINHERITED) A person can work with someone on a project, but that does not automatically give notability. In the same vein, performing in a film doesn't always give notability. For example, Lord worked as a gaffer on some films but that role is considered to be relatively minor when it comes to extending notability here on Wikipedia. If Lord had received a major award for his work on a film or was specifically cited in a news outlet or review for that work, then he would gain notability from working on that film. It's why you see so few articles on people who aren't in large roles such as director or whatnot. Now as far as his role as director goes, being a director doesn't give automatic notability. The films have to have received coverage in reliable sources, which I'm not finding. Just being something doesn't extend notability.

On a side note, I have to ask: are you related to or affiliated with Lord or anyone related to the Chryzinium film in any way? If so, you should really look over our WP:COI policy. I only ask because of the extremely limited amount of exposure that Lord, Chryzinium, and the Wades have received. Editing with a COI isn't forbidden, but it can affect how you view notability and sources. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:39, 13 December 2013 (UTC)