User talk:JD554/Archive 2

WikiProject Alternative music newsletter
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated Giggabot (stop!) 07:31, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Everyhit.com
OK, I understand about the policies on sources. No further mention will be made to the website in the opener, but having checked my copy of Guiness British Hit Singles I can confirm the original statement is true, to the best of my knowledge. No other act has had more Hits in the UK Top 40 Singles w/o a no. 1. best, Sunil060902 (talk) 11:34, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Would it be OK to quote British Hit Singles and Albums as a source?
 * Rationale for Top 40?
 * Compromise between Top 10s and Top 75s
 * UK's premier TV chart shows did/do show Top 40 chart run-downs, not Top 75s
 * best, Sunil060902 (talk) 15:37, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Quick question
First off, great job fixing the citations on the discographies! I have a small question, have you come across an instance where your book outright contradicts EveryHit? ie, EveryHit is found to be wrong (within the Top 40 of course)? I just wanted to see if we could roughly classify EveryHit as an accurate source, and use it at least somewhat confidently. indopug (talk) 13:39, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Conquering myself today
That original version of "The Cutter" kind of sucks. I'm glad the label made them re-record it. WesleyDodds (talk) 21:32, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I have the Ocean Rain reissue. Those bonus versions were decent, and the "All You Need Is Love" cover wasn't embarassing. WesleyDodds (talk) 11:34, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Almost forgot: talk to User:Ceoil about Bunnymen sources. He's also quite a nice fellow (except when he's been drinking and ranting on about all the godforsaken cityfolk, but that's par for the course). WesleyDodds (talk) 08:47, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi JD554, can you give me a few days and I'll see what I can track down. Also, don't pay too much heed to what Dodds says about me; he has this preconception of Irishmen that I just can't shake ;). Whatever, would be great to see some work on the Bunnymen, best of luck with it. Ceoil (talk) 22:33, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Posted a few articles here. Will add more so you might watchlist the page. Hope these are helpful. Ceoil (talk) 23:29, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Rock's back pages? Yeah; by far the best muso archive I've found so far. Good old Barney Hoskyns. Ceoil (talk) 23:18, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Have you read Simon Reynolds' Rip It Up and Start Again: Postpunk 1978-1984? There's some bits that could be used in the album articles. WesleyDodds (talk) 09:59, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Which edition do you have? The original British version is longer and has a yellow cover. Personally I think it's good to start with the PIL chapters, take a detour to the Manchester chapter, then read the rest of it in any order you wish. My favorite chapters are the ones devoted to Manchester, the rise of New Pop, goth and "the Big Music", and ZTT (the whole story behind Frankie Goes to Hollywood's "Relax" is insanely captivating). WesleyDodds (talk) 10:16, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The British version obviously has the merit of covering more ground (the American version, for example, combines the goth and "Big Music" chapters and excises entire chapters), but the American version have tighter prose by Reynolds (he's often freewheeling when left to his own devices) and has more momentum when you read it. WesleyDodds (talk) 10:38, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, I'm not sure we have any decent precendents for compilation albums to follow, so you might just want to skip to Echo & the Bunnymen. Of course, you could always try going for the first compilation album GA. . . WesleyDodds (talk) 08:31, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The project has never been that formal. Don't mind that. WesleyDodds (talk) 08:14, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Question: are all the Peel sessions releases accounted for? I know for one there's a Strange Fruit CD compilation of Peel sessions by Manchester bands that contains "Handsome Devil". WesleyDodds (talk) 08:49, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Can you help add chart information to Disintegration? WesleyDodds (talk) 09:32, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks! WesleyDodds (talk) 20:23, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Quick favor: I need quick confirmation of the UK chart placing of "Live Forever" with your print ref to replace the current not-so-great fan website ref currently used. WesleyDodds (talk) 08:46, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Question: if I listed The Smiths here, would you pitch out on it? It's the only Top Importance band article left in the project that isn't a GA or FA yet. WesleyDodds (talk) 09:02, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Not sure if you've ever seen it, but the sources list is pretty useful. WesleyDodds (talk) 06:03, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * When it comes to magazine issues, just note any issues with relevant articles, or else you'll quickly go insane if you have a ton of magazines (as I do). Also, Joy Division doesn't come under the project scope since the band ended before alternative rock truly emerged, while contemporaries like The Cure, the Banshees, the Bunnymen, etc. were able to survive the decline of the post-punk movement and became alt-rock. New Order, however, does come under the project scope. WesleyDodds (talk) 08:41, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * It is funny how sometimes it takes a while to define a style of music. Consider that the first use of the phrase "Heavy metal" as a genre term was in 1972, but the first metal albums are considered to have come out in 1968 and 1969. Arguably the two most important metal albums ever, Led Zeppelin IV and Paranoid, came out a year before anyone knew what to call them! WesleyDodds (talk) 09:05, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I've done quite a bit of research on the origin of not only alternative rock, but the origin of the term. What's interesting (and somewhat annoying) was that through the early eighties instead of a precise genre term, "alternative" was essentially a synonym for "underground music". There's articles I've found from back then that included hip-hop under the "alternative music" banner. It's also really weird when you get to a bit more of a precise use of the term in the late 80s, and to the mainstream press (at least in the United States) the genre pretty much ammounted to "R.E.M. and a bunch of gothy English bands". There's this 1991 Entertainment Weekly article on alternative rock icons that lists four artists: Michael Stipe, Robert Smith, Morrissey, and Dave Gahan. WesleyDodds (talk) 09:25, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * After listening to Southern Death Cult, I can see why people were disappointed by the time The Cult rolled around, even if they were a better hard rock band than other hard rock bands at the time. WesleyDodds (talk) 09:42, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Photos help
I've taken your advice from the peer review I put up and have been looking for a usable image. Seeing as though I was 24 years away from the world when the Panthers last won the league championship I put up a request on a Coventry Blaze forum asking if anyone would be willing to share their photos. I've had a reply from Mark Tredgold saying that I'm free to use a picture of his of the league trophy on condition that he is given a credit. The only problem is he's a professional photographer and, I think, the official Blaze photographer. Would it be wise to use his work and how would I tag his image? Cheers. KimThePanther (talk) 15:24, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Hey

I'm definitely not a professional photographer! Whilst I am the Blaze "official" photographer, you're really more than welcome to use the pic of the trophy if you credit me. I promise not to track you down with a team of lawyers - it's only a photo! ;) Mark.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.32.95.232 (talk) 20:44, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Zack Smith
Would you be able to help out expand this article Zack Smith hockey player as it is marked with a proposed deletion of this article? I noticed you had created Brent Bobyck I added a reference. The article was created by a new user to wikipedia. SriMesh | talk  03:21, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much for taking the time with Zack Smith I just don't know as much about sports and what should be on wikipedia, and this one was started by a new user User talk:Tahi0009. Kind Regards SriMesh |  talk  03:59, 28 June 2008 (UTC)



has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

WikiProject Alternative music newsletter
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated Giggabot (stop!) 07:35, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

UK vs GBR
Just curious, what standard is that? I'm using ISO_3166-1. ccwaters (talk) 00:55, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

WPFood
You asked why we are tagging all articles related to food with the WPFOOD tag. Please take the to read the preceding post on the project talk page. We are integrating all tags under a single banner, with the sub project listed in side.

Look here for a full explanation.

Currently we are removing the task force banners, Foodservice has been finished and Cheeses is next.

--Jeremy ( Blah blah... ) 06:37, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Issues with TinucherianBot in Project Banner Tagging for WP:FOOD
Thank you for expressing your concerns on the recent issues with TinucherianBot in Project Banner Tagging for WP:FOOD. I have made some comments and explainations at Wikipedia_talk:Bots/Requests_for_approval and I am leaving this note just for your information --  TinuCherian  (Wanna Talk?) - 09:54, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Smiths discography
Hi. Re your revert of my edit to the Smiths discography article - I'm guessing that most people wouldn't know what "Department of Enjoyment" or "Poll Winners EP" were, hence me adding the detail that they were produced by the NME. But whether this is important or not is a matter of opinion, I suppose. MFlet1 (talk) 14:54, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Cure Greatest Hits
Hi. I have citations and references for the main write-up on the Cure's Greatest Hits album. I don't know how to properly edit this into Wikipedia. Would you be able to help? Thanks. Lucifer Spam (talk) 19:02, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Peer review limits
The guidelines for Peer review ask that editors nominate no more than one article per day (and four total at any one time). While the rules say that one of the requests can be removed, I will let it slide since this is the first time. Take care, Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 03:45, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * It is no problem, just wanted to let you know for future reference. Keep up the good work, Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 11:26, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

WP:LOTD/WP:LOTM
Congratulations on getting what appears to be your first successful WP:FL during the last month. You may want to get involved in our List of the Day/List of the Month experiment. Feel free to help us select next months lists at User:TonyTheTiger/List of the Day/voting/200808 or nominate your list for consideration to be a LOTD in September at User:TonyTheTiger/List of the Day/Nominees/200809.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 21:03, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Red Links
Sorry for any disturbance (agf), but you misunderstand the redlinking. I only put red links where there should be an article. For example, "Numa Records" doesn't exist, but there should be an article created for it and a record label elligible (as opposed to a normal word which would go to wikitionary). In the track listings, I link the singles, which should have articles, as there's articles for all Gary Numan singles before 1982. As for the album personnel, most articles have every single member linked regardless of how many times they were linked earlier or if they have articles or not. By redlinking those mentioned above, when articles are created for them eventually, they'll appear normal and we won't have to remember to go back to link them (which is something we forget VERY OFTEN). Let's get ahead of the game, shall we?

BTW, all of this goes for everywhere, not just my Gary Numan album tidy-up spree.

And redlinks are everywhere, so you should just go to every single article on Wikipedia (or at least every single music-related article...good luck) and edit 'em all, not just articles I edit (which you seemingly do). Angry Shoplifter (talk) 08:50, 12 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I read the Red link and the WTAF pages, and according to them, what I'm doing is just fine. You're missing that they say only redlink articles you intent to create to lists or disambiguation pages. I'm redlinking in albums, not any of those two. They clearly state that they should be added when:


 * A new article is needed. When a Wikipedian writes an article, it is common practice to link key topics pertinent to an understanding of the subject, even if those topics don't have an article on Wikipedia yet.


 * ...and that they should be added only when relevent to context. I'm clearly following the rules, as I'm redlinking a missing record label, singles, and band personnel at the bottom of that page (especially the first two), which are all linked on other articles when they exist, and (when speaking of Numan albums) will eventually get them. Besides, Gary Numan and his works are largely innactive and ignored on Wikipedia (plus I'm a large fan of him), so I AM considering creating articles for his post-1981 singles. On top of all that, even though they say you're encouraged to create articles for your redlinks even outside disambig. and list pages, they don't say you HAVE TO, and the encouragement is far less than that of those two kinds of pages.


 * FYI, I'm going back to redlink what I redlinked on the articles I edited, as I should. Lastly, I'm not telling you what articles you should edit. I'm saying if you're editing at that time to mostly remove redlinks, why just wait around and do that to the articles I edit, when you could easily jump ahead of the game and do that to many other articles, like the Gary Numan ones I didn't tidy yet? DON'T DO THAT TO THE GARY NUMAN ALBUMS, as I'm going to redlink the things that are necessary, but I'm just saying your times and/or reasons for editing is illogical and doesn't get accomplished what you're trying to accomplished as good as you could have. Angry Shoplifter (talk) 21:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC)


 * (All of this message is to your past 3 to me, make sure you read every bit so I don't have to repeat myself). Are you blind!? WP:WTAF states lists/disambig stuff in the first sentence, and WP:Redlink states blatantly about lists/disambig being the ony strict WTAF:


 * A red link, like this one, signifies a link to a page that does not exist in Wikipedia. Sometimes it is useful in editing article text to create a red link to indicate that a page will be created soon or that an article should be created for the topic because it would be notable and verifiable; however when considering adding red links to lists or disambiguation pages, editors are encouraged to write the article first. Red links should not be created for topics that are unlikely ever to have articles, such as a celebrity's romantic interest (who is not a celebrity in his or her own right) or every chapter in a book. <-- And my links are valid/going have articles.


 * And MAKE SURE YOU READ MY SECOND MESSAGE TO YOU THOROUGHLY, which justifies that my redlinking is fine and abbides to the rules, regardless of someone's opinon. As for the session musians, not all of them are mentioned in each article, so it's not easy to determine if they're session or not. But whatever, I guess they could be unlinked, but many articles have all artists linked in "personnel"/"band member" sections regardless of anything. Hence why I said "especially the first two" when I was justifying the redlinking in my second message, which definately are valid to the subject and should be linked. And I don't have to write them, not a single one. Though as stated earlier, I'm considering writing post-1981 single articles.


 * Lastly, why the hell are you watching articles that have so many blatant errors and that haven't really been edited by you? How many articles ARE you watching? 273985705479? I only have like 85 or something (and half of them are largely ignored pages).


 * I respect your concern over these issues, but you should acknowledge that I'm the only person that's "taking charge" in cleaning up articles like Numan's, and you have to admit that my contributions do help improve them (plus other music article, like ignored bands and albums of other artists), as they were originally in a crappy state, unorganized, INCONSISTANT WITH EACH OTHER, had incorrect links, incorrect genres and opening paragraphs, and had contradictions. Angry Shoplifter (talk) 09:17, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Everything you said has been talked over or responded to by me just fine. Since you're confused, I used caps and bolds so those ideas STAND OUT IN YOUR MIND (LIKE HERE) and so you could see them clearly, not as any shouting or anger simulation. As I said, read my last two messages completely and carefully, and you will see that everything is completely civil. Besides, if there's one or two things that are uncivil, please don't make an issue over it and concentrate on everything else. Now, back to "tidying up for consistancy"... Angry Shoplifter (talk) 01:31, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

G-day
Gday, i am sorry about the stupid article i uploaded earlier. it was more of a peer pressure thing and spur of the moment. i acknowledge my stupidity and it will never happen again ;)

--Mattmcfadyen (talk) 00:05, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Source for the title of The Cure's 13th Album
Sorry about not adding the source of the album title. Here they are

Chain Of Flowers (Music Website): http://craigjparker.blogspot.com/2008/07/dream-thirteen-listed-at-hmv-japan.html

HMV Japan Listing: http://www.hmv.co.jp/product/detail/2757473  Dirtyharry1994 (talk) 09:03, 16 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Please leave the title, It looks alot better than their 13th Studio Album. Please —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dirtyharry1994 (talk • contribs) 09:12, Jul 16, 2008 (UTC)
 * I've restored The Cure's thirteenth album as redirect only since I don't want to enter the content discussion; moves can be undone as long as there is only a redirect pointing to the destination. Which means in thsi case that you have to move it back first to Dream 13. See Move. If you need further help, let me know.--Tikiwont (talk) 12:19, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, given some technical problems I've now undone the move. --Tikiwont (talk) 12:31, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Sigur Ros
There is nothing wrong with my edit. Post Rock is not an accurate description of any music nor is Vonlensku. That is not what wordless vocals are. I did use the Sigur Ros website as a source so I think its ok. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Millere08 (talk • contribs) 16:04, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

The Quakes page
All the text from the article comes from the official web site www.thequakes.com. It is not a fan site it is directly from the band. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Psychobillypolice (talk • contribs) 03:27, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Dear sir; dont you have anything else to do besides try to discredit The quakes page? The article that you seem to have a problem with is taken directly from the official web site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.108.214.71 (talk) 21:32, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Dude...please just leave it alone will you? What is it to you anyway? why do you care? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Psychobillypolice (talk • contribs) 01:11, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Ok so are you targeting ALL entries on wikipedia or just The Quakes? Really...what is your agenda here? I dont understand you vigilance with this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Psychobillypolice (talk • contribs) 20:38, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

RE: The Smiths discography
The information contained on the web forum that I linked to (on australian-charts.com) was taken from the set of Kent Music Report books published by David Kent. The information from that page is "David Kent (1993). Australian Chart Book 1970 - 1992. Australian Chart Book, St Ives, N.S.W.. ISBN 0-646-11917-6." on the particular book the information is from.  Ss112  ( Talk here! ) 08:56, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Succession boxes
Ok, thanks for info. I'll try to fix it. Pietaster (talk) 14:19, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

You may be interested in this RfC
You may be interested in Requests for comment/Psychobillypolice. In particular I'd appreciate your signature in the "Users certifying the basis for this dispute" section, as you have also had some negative encounters with this editor (specifically at both your talk pages, Talk:The Quakes, and Talk:Psychobilly) and at least 2 editors' certifications are necessary for the RfC to continue. --IllaZilla (talk) 06:31, 25 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi IllaZilla, I've added my signature to the RfC (hopefully in the right place!). Do I need to provide a written statement? Also, am I still okay to give warnings for removing the template from The Quakes, or is it best to leave for now until the RfC has finished? --JD554 (talk) 07:58, 25 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't think a written statement is required, but you are certainly welcome to provide one (I've never done an RfC before so I'm not sure). I didn't feel a statement was necessary from me since I was the one initiating the RfC and all my comments were already there in the form of the summary and evidence, but I think your comments would be helpful as well. --IllaZilla (talk) 16:20, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

The White Stripes discography
Thanks for those edits, as those table's sure were confusing me...  Red157  ( talk •  contribs )  10:48, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Wenceslau Geraldes Teixeira
Please stop tagging this page as unimportant. Teixeira is a reputable scientist and as tehre is no official webpage for interested parties to find, my company decided to post a casual biography of him so that interested parties might be able to learn something about the scientist whose research they were reading. His research may alter entire farming techniques and it is important that people be informed of who Teixeira is.

Andreaphill (talk) 14:10, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for July 2008
SoxBot II (talk) 03:16, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Siouxsie, Steve Jones and that dirty old man Bill Grundy
Let's talk about it on the talk page rather than via reverts, I have started something at Talk:Siouxsie Sioux. --Stormie (talk) 00:17, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Siouxsie edit war
I post you a reply at the Siouxsie talk page. Carliertwo (talk) 16:58, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Pamela Dalton
Hi. Replied to at talk page. .seVer!Ty^- (talk) 20:24, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Did you bother looking
If you had bothered looking its oasis official youtube page i was linking the song too so I don't see the problem.

Dwanyewest (talk) 17:52, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

petplan usa pet insurance
please send me a copy of the deleted article: petplan usa pet insurance.

I wish to edit it so that it doesnt become speedily deleted again!

thanks Athlon2009 (talk) 20:39, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
For adding the references to the Slovak gold and silver euro coins articles. Just curious, how did you find it since I just created it a few minutes ago? Please feel free to answer right here, I am watching your page now.

Thanks, Miguel.mateo (talk) 09:58, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem, glad I could help. I found the page by patrolling the list of new pages. --JD554 (talk) 10:03, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

deletion of Telugu News
Could you please let me know why the article Telugu News was deleted? I am unable to interpret from history page? Appreciate your response. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Manchusri (talk • contribs) 12:18, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

To add to this, Telugu is a language spoken in Andhra Pradesh a state of India. And the Article was meant for News in Telugu langauage and more so mediums/institutions that offer News in Telugu. Also, the history and contribution of various famous journalists and other personalities is ought to be included in here. This is nothing about a specific person or institution —Preceding unsigned comment added by Manchusri (talk • contribs) 12:25, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Big Brother 2008 (UK) weekly summary
The main article had reached 82k, and 41k was just the summary. Last year the summary was split off after the show finished but with for weeks still to go I could see that one section reaching 60k. The guidelines for page size suggest 32k, but I think the main article is fine at 41k. Darrenhusted (talk) 12:36, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes I realised afterwards. You should hopefully have already noticed that I've withdrawn the prod. --JD554 (talk) 12:40, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

John Arcand
Your speedy was a bit harsh - A7 says "to avoid speedy deletion an article does not have to prove that its subject is notable, just give a reasonable indication of why it might be notable", and getting his country's highest honour seems "a reasonable indication of why [he] might be notable", don't you think? I've removed the speedy, but you might need to be a little slower to speedy new articles. (I've got no involvement with this subject, just dropped by to stub-sort it). PamD (talk) 10:14, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Douglas Macmillan
Fyi, This person is VERY notable. He founded one of the most world renowned charities for cancer and his biography is listed in the UK's Oxford dictionary of national bio's. I'm rating the page 'stub class' and I hope to add more details as time allows Kingkong77 (talk) 10:42, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Hey dude
Hey dude, thanks for the feedbacks. Because this is my first time using wikipedia, so I must have violated the rules. Thanks for informing me directly.

With Regards, Seng —Preceding unsigned comment added by SengXun (talk • contribs) 13:30, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
I just want to say "Thank you". Best --Weissmann (talk) 06:15, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Gemeindeverband Hochsauerland-Waldeck
Hi JD554. You are right; I thought the article was about a region (parish churches) rather than a group/software. My mistake and apologies. Best, PeterSymonds (talk)  11:13, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Kingpin (chess)
Well delete it if you must. I gave a couple of links. I can do more. It already existed as red link in Kingpin with a reference to what it was. As I say it's a low budget magazine but quite entertaining.  SmokeyTheCat   •TALK•  14:41, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

jd can you help me
hey i am trying to put a biogrophy up about a very important person in the clothing industry what am i doing wrong anyway you can call me on phone and walk me threw this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xlrockerlx (talk • contribs) 17:27, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

jd all the sources are 3rd party man

the source i am wiritng about is a celebrtry i mean you see this guy on ufc

all the ufc guys wear his clothing  he is known world wide

can you call me on the the phone? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xlrockerlx (talk • contribs) 17:41, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

JD if you help me  i will deck you out in our clothing line www.skinindustries.com who do i have to pay if not in clothes my jobs on the line here. u understand this stuff i dont

u let me know man i have been trying to do somthing for over a month now and wikipidea is not my thing  i am begging u for help or if you could find some1 to help me i dont understand  that first article thing iv put reliable resourses everything  2nd party  3rd party u name it

go google his name u will see what i mean —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xlrockerlx (talk • contribs) 17:48, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

who wants to do a article for me?

i will reward you i am frustrated and cant figure it out.. their is always something i dont do and it gets deletedXlrockerlx (talk) 18:06, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Requests for comment/Psychobillypolice
Just letting you know that this RfC has been closed. The conclusion has been listed on the page. Wizardman 19:35, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Wizardman's warning as an administrator will still be in effect, however, as the dispute is resolved (since the user stopped editing), and there was no other third party input, the conclusion has been modified accordingly. Ncmvocalist (talk) 15:33, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Sauerländer Heimatbund
An article that you have been involved in editing, Sauerländer Heimatbund, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Sauerländer Heimatbund. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?

No no, don't worry I think you might be interested. And I'm bold and tag the elder ;-) Thank you. Sebastian scha. (talk) 14:50, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

No reason to
Ah no, it is rather me being somewhat embarrassed on failing to get my point across or maybe because being or at least appearing grumpy the previous time on this same article may have made it more difficult to ask me directly. So just let me know next time you have any doubt even if I am not yet involved. But it is Friday afternoon here, so have a nice weekend.--Tikiwont (talk) 14:56, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:4.13 Dream.jpg
Hello, JD554. There are many simple text logos under public domain. I believe that Image:4.13 Dream.jpg is simple enough to be PD-ineligible and PD-textlogo. Could you explain your edit?--OsamaKReply? on my talk page, please 12:07, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Geraldine McGowan
When I said that the artist has multiple recordings, I was referring to the following criterion: Magnetic Music, her record label, appears to be notable, although it doesn't have a Wikipedia article. See http://news.google.com/archivesearch?ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&tab=wn&q=%22Magnetic+Music%22&sa=N&sugg=d&as_ldate=1999&as_hdate=2005&lnav=d0&ldrange=1884,1990  --Eastmain (talk) 21:54, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e. an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable).
 * Also, http://www.hotpress.com/archive/416861.html seems like another argument in favour of notability, even though it is behind a paywall. --Eastmain (talk) 22:05, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

viva la vida (song)
do no erase the official turkish chart! --Triancula (talk) 02:39, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Discographies/Collaboration
As a member of WikiProject Discographies, I thought you might be interested to participate in the collaboration. Hpfan9374 (talk) 12:58, 31 August 2008 (UTC)