User talk:JDD1985

James Girvin
I've added the "prod" template to the article James Girvin, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:James Girvin. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. JRHorse 04:29, 4 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. I would like to point out Wikipedia's notability guidelines for living persons, which can be found at WP:BIO and WP:LIVING. I do not believe the fact that James Girvin is a notable person on the Boston College campus is enough for him to be considered "notable", per Wikipedia's guidelines. Please feel free to share your thoughts on this. If possible, clean up the article so that it sounds less like a resume and more neutral. Thanks, JRHorse 04:45, 4 December 2006 (UTC)


 * By the way, if you yourself are James Girvin, this information should be in your User page, and not as an actual article. JRHorse 05:20, 4 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I am not James Girvin, He is a respected political and humor writer on my campus and I felt that it would be a great way of letting others know about him. If you don't believe me read his articles in the link I posted


 * I saw the website... but that is a source of his own writing. I still do not believe he satisfies WP:BIO. I will be sending this article through the AfD process so that other editors and administrators may give their opinions. JRHorse 17:09, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:N1601103 29701.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:N1601103 29701.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 06:06, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Tornado 005.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tornado 005.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ccwaters 18:38, 11 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The question is under what conditions do you let others to use it. see WP:TAGS ccwaters 13:37, 13 December 2006 (UTC)