User talk:JDPS47

COI
If you have an affiliation with Sullivan & Cromwell, you need to declare it per WP:COI. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 14:40, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

No affiliation. I recently read a book about this company and was surprised at the lack of information on this page, particularly compared with other law firm pages. I have only added factual information that is supported by external sources. For example, look at the pages for Akin Gump, Cravath Swaine & Moore, Covington and Burling, Williams & Connolly, Jones Day, etc. None of what I added to this page is "puffery."

Sockpuppet investigation
You have been mentioned here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/JDPS47 Thenightaway (talk) 18:14, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Non-WP:NPOV edits to law firms
Your unconstructive, non-neutral edits on law firm pages have returned. Please stop adding and re-adding promotional content (WP:PROMO), including that which has been rejected and reverted in either the recent or in the distant past. WP:COI additions and WP:EDIT WARRING are also unacceptable. Lindenfall (talk) 16:07, 6 May 2024 (UTC)


 * I fail to see how these edits are nonconstructive. Look at the introductions to similar businesses such as consulting firms and investment banks. Mckinsey, Bain, Boston Consulting Group, Moelis & Co. and PJT Partners are a few examples that have helpful context explaining the given firm. As you pointed out, I previously edited a different law firm page, which shows that these edits are actually neutral and not favoring a specific company. JDPS47 (talk) 17:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Yes, quite a few law firms still need promotional material removed — thanks for pointing that out. Lots to do. Additions that merely promote a business are not welcome, which is why yours have often been reverted. Similar content existing elsewhere is not a justification, see WP:OTHERCONTENT. You have also failed to note the many reverts in your own history for these same reasons, the policies attached to them, or even the visible advertising banner already displayed on your last attempt's article, due to additions such as your own. Adding more accolades, as you did, is the opposite of what's called for in this genre, just as it was during, for instance, 2021 reverts of your WP:DISRUPTIVE EDITING. Lindenfall (talk) 18:27, 6 May 2024 (UTC)