User talk:JDunham2282

Welcome!
Hello, JDunham2282, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Chaunty spillane, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  19:06, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Chaunty spillane


A tag has been placed on Chaunty spillane requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  19:06, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  19:19, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Chauncy Spillane
Before I commit myself on that, you'll need to explain how she meets the notability guidelines. If she doesn't meet the linked criteria, she won't get an article. You will also need independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to her, social media and other sites that can be self-edited (like IMDB), blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the she claims or interviewing its management. It's not enough that she exists.

You don't help yourself by removing speedy deletion tags or by posting one-sided comments on the talk page from your ISP address (pretty obvious when you have edited the article from that ISP too. You appear to have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject; you are required by our terms and conditions to declare that interest. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:19, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi [[User:Jimfbleak|<b Here are some verifiable links proving existence that are not social media. 1)https://laulapidescompany.com/chauntyspillane/ 2) www.ghostbustersmania.com/2015/08/13/chaunty-spillane/ 3) http://ink361.com/app/users/ig-210951054/chauntyspillane/photos 4) thewestfieldnews.com/page/1208 5) http://missbikinichallenge.com/page/BuyMagazines 6) http://www.ltwcustomcosmetics.com/CatalogueRetrieve.aspx?ProductID=7311639&A=SearchResult&SearchID=20045216&ObjectID=7311639&ObjectType=27 7) ltwcustomcosmetics.wix.com/lynntassinariwegiel#! 8) www.metacritic.com/movie/central-intelligence/details 9) http://www.joomag.com/en/newsstand/malevolent-magazine-4-august-2014/0597487001407214412 10) http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=chaunty+spillane&FORM=HDRSC2 11) https://www.stage32.com/profile/483599/about 12) issuu.com/thewestfieldnews/docs/saturday__august_22__2015/1 13) lingerie-magazine.com/profile_info.php?ID=144


 * Please look at the link for independent verifiable sources above. Your sites may not be social media, but they are a random collection of sales sites, search results and other non-reliable sources. I don't believe that missbikinichallenge and lingerie magazine are quite in the same league as the New York Times Youtube and instagram are user-generated, not acceptable either. Have a look, for example at Kareen Kapoor, today's front page article.


 * I will make sure no one edits it after you do. &mdash; You can't, anyone can edit if they have proper sources.
 *  We would be honored. We are fans of Chaunty and she has over 4 million followers&mdash; Who is we?
 * I can restore the text in a user subpage if you wish, I just want you to be sure you know what is required. Let me know
 * Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:35, 21 September 2015 (UTC)