User talk:JEMead

Welcome...

Hello, JEMead, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Sunray (talk) 02:29, 21 December 2011 (UTC) Sunray (talk) 02:29, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Canvassing
Please don't canvass those editors who you think will provide a sympathetic viewpoint to your RfC. WP:Canvassing is not allowed for the purpose of vote-stacking. The RfC will attract editors by itself. A better way is to signal the existence of the RfC on a relevant WikiProject talk page. Binksternet (talk) 17:15, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I was following the instructions by Noleander. he said to pick people. I am not sure anyone will be interested? I did not think we are taking a vote. I appreciate the additional information. Thanks! JEMead (talk) 17:25, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Hello
I just got back to Wikipedia. I have replied on the Theosophy article talk page. Let's keep working together. Factseducado (talk) 13:56, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Help Survey
Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,

the wub (talk) 17:36, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)

working on pages User:JEMead/Church of Light and User:JEMead/Arthur Versluis

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:The Church of Light


A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:The Church of Light, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Namespace redirect which was blanked.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:50, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

NRM Manual of Style
As you are a member of the New religious movements work group, I thought I should bring to your attention the fact that someone recently gutted the New religious movements Manual of Style. I have found this article to be quite helpful in editing articles related to NRM's. I reverted the edit but that was re-reverted (if there is such a word) quite soon aver my reversion.

Perhaps, all that is needed is that the name of the article should be changed from "Manual of Style" to something more appropriate (e.g. General guidance for articles on NRM's or something similar). However, I really would prefer not losing the guidance and thought that I should bring this to the attention of those in the work group. Taxee (talk) 22:25, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi
GWTreePlants (talk) 23:36, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

K. Paul Johnson
Articles for deletion/K. Paul Johnson Goblin Face (talk) 21:33, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)