User talk:JET9725

October 2018
Hello, I'm Larry Hockett. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Larry Hockett (Talk) 21:37, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Emily Alyn Lind. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 11:48, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Anthony Davis
Do not remove and ignore hidden notes on articles just do what the note says not to do. These notes are put on articles for a reason. Continue to make disruptive edits by ignoring these, and that made lead to a WP:BLOCK. Consider this your first warning.-- Rockchalk 717 06:59, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Same goes for LeBron James.-- Rockchalk 717 07:02, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Anthony Davis, you may be blocked from editing. Rockchalk 717 15:25, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * As the hidden note says that you keep ignoring just to remove, do not add a number on Anthony Davis’s page or LeBron James’s page until their numbers are updated at .-- Rockchalk 717 15:30, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Hello, I'm Bagumba. Your recent edit to the page Dwight Howard appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 08:03, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
Your recent contributions at Antonio Brown appear to show that you are engaged in edit warring; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not override another editor's contributions. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. James-the-Charizard (talk) 16:38, 13 September 2019 (UTC)