User talk:JG4236

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chris Ballinger (October 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hermera34 was: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mohamed_Lahyani&diff=prev&oldid=1009132886 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chris Ballinger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Chris_Ballinger Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hermera34&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Chris_Ballinger reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hermera34 (talk) 22:32, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Hello, I'm C.Fred. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Joe Walsh (Illinois politician) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —C.Fred (talk) 00:07, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Curt Schilling. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Do not add speculation about future elections. —C.Fred (talk) 01:05, 10 October 2016 (UTC) Hi JG4236, I have unfortunately had to suppress some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages! -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 13:14, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

I'd like to add that, looking at the subpages you've created, you would be better off at a website like Ancestry.com. Wikipedia is not a web hosting service, and the majority of the pages you created are clearly not intended to improve the encyclopedia, and they also expose personal information that the subjects may not want on a public website. Please save the information you need then add the code to the pages so that they will be removed. You may also reply here and I will delete them. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 13:29, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello, yes please, delete them! I've been trying to do this for so long and can't figure out how to do it, thank you!--JG4236 (talk) 04:57, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

December 2016
Hello, I'm A guy saved by Jesus. Your recent edit to the page Aroldis Chapman appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 17:32, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Wilson Ramos, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 17:35, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Ian Desmond. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 21:01, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Tony Atkinson
It would be nice if you're going to bury someone to at least cite sources. Please see the talk page where I can find 'mentions' of his death, but nobody points to anything citeable! Shenme (talk) 02:04, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Chris Ballinger


Hello, JG4236. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Chris Ballinger".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 23:26, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages
You're probably not aware but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. The article about the person you added to December 30 did not have any source that I could add to this page to back up your addition so this change has been reverted. Please do not restore it without providing a direct reliable source. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 03:25, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

August 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Andre Iguodala. —Bagumba (talk) 15:46, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Citation needed
Hey there, in this diff, you added an entry (twice) without any citations. Could you find a source to add? See WP:ENDORSERFC. Bobbychan193 (talk) 23:03, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

June 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at October 2. Toddst1 (talk) 02:44, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Presidential campaign announcements in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Presidential_campaign_announcements_in_the_United_States check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Presidential_campaign_announcements_in_the_United_States?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:45, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at November 1. Toddst1 (talk) 05:30, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced personal information or related content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Marc D'Amelio, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Toddst1 (talk) 05:33, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of The Office (American TV series) characters into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI! 18:45, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Marc D'Amelio.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Marc D'Amelio.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.thehour.com/news/article/D-Amelio-blames-Democrats-after-drunken-driving-13267277.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Blablubbs (talk • contribs) 01:44, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Devon Abner


A tag has been placed on Devon Abner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://herbalskiey.weebly.com/blog/the-office-cast, https://homeoftvnostalgia.wixsite.com/00stvnostalgia/the-office-an-american-workplace, and https://weheyy.merrychristmas2020.info/2922-article.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Modussiccandi (talk) 18:42, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Devon Abner moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Devon Abner, has no sources or citations and cannot remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved it to draft space (with a prefix of  before the article title) where you can work on it with minimal disruption. When you feel that it meets our notability and neutrality requirements, and is thus ready for mainspace, please submit it using the Articles for Creation template on the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:37, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Invitation
Hello, JG4236! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time. Me-123567-Me (talk) 21:50, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alerts: AP and BLP
FYI. ― Mandruss  &#9742;  04:16, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:RichardRobbins.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:RichardRobbins.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement&#32;of https://twitter.com/rar624. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:58, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Hello, I'm Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2018 Florida gubernatorial election, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck (talk) 17:34, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2024 United States presidential election. Sundayclose (talk) 04:50, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Tom Kirkman (character) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Tom Kirkman (character), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... disco spinster   talk  01:03, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Willbb234Talk (please &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me in replies) 09:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Block
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for persistent addition of unsourced content, but also, as early as a month ago, for plainly disruptive editing. Please review the multiple warnings and notices above this space. Continuing with this behaviour is unsustainable. Thanks and good luck. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. El_C 10:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Appealing my Block
I have admitted that I should have sourced the 2021 Australian Open - Women's Singles edit, and for that I apologize. I also apologize for linking one of my own pages to a real page WHICH WAS AN ACCIDENT! But this block is seriously unnecessary. If you don't feel inclined to completely lift the block, then please consider reducing it to 2-4 days.--JG4236 (talk) 15:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:JG4236/dadabadada
Hello, JG4236. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:JG4236/dadabadada, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 07:24, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

I WOULD LIKE IT DELETED!--JG4236 (talk) 16:56, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:JG4236/lilguss
Hello, JG4236. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:JG4236/lilguss, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 07:25, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

I WOULD LIKE IT DELETED!--JG4236 (talk) 16:56, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Edits to Martin Garbus
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:55, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Block again, same thing
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 23:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Appealing my Block... again

 * You may want to review No_original_research, especially Do not add unsourced material from your personal experience, because that would make Wikipedia a primary source of that material. Use extra caution when handling primary sources about living people; see WP:Biographies of living persons § Avoid misuse of primary sources, which is policy.

You were blocked for this edit, which you made after I gave you a final warning for the Martin Garbus edit. You've been warned numerous times about this previously and blocked for it once. The next block will be much longer or indefinite. OhNo itsJamie Talk 02:27, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
 * JG, I'm surprised the admins involved here didn't change your block to indefinite already. You have demonstrated that you haven't a clue about WP:NOR and don't want to know about it.  Beyond that, you're the victim of the tyrants?  GMAB!  Toddst1 (talk) 16:45, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, JG4236. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the pages Irving Glickman, Esmeralda Arboleda Cadavid and Mireya Arboleda, you have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 19:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Adding birth dates without reliable sources after numerous warnings and two blocks
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:51, 17 March 2021 (UTC)


 * None of the sources you included in your edits to Naomi B. Robbins include a birth date, which is why that's been reverted. I have an NYT subscription, and I checked that source myself. Having been blocked twice for adding unsourced birthdates, you have no excuses to claim ignorance of our WP:BLP policy, which applies to all editors, including you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:42, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Okay, I understand (mostly). I am wondering when you think it would be appropriate to allow me to edit again.--JG4236 (talk) 18:20, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * By the tone of your argument, it sounds like never. Toddst1 (talk) 01:47, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Naomi B. Robbins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wiley.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:JG4236/2024prez


Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at User:JG4236/2024prez. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Bait30  Talk 2 me pls? 03:24, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:JG4236/2028prez


Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at User:JG4236/2028prez. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Bait30  Talk 2 me pls? 03:24, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:JG4236/television


Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at User:JG4236/television. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Bait30  Talk 2 me pls? 02:36, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Tom Kirkman
Hello, JG4236. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tom Kirkman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:04, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Tom Kirkman


Hello, JG4236. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tom Kirkman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:56, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

File source problem with File:JulianGlickman.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:JulianGlickman.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:JG4236


Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as User:JG4236, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 03:05, 18 October 2022 (UTC)