User talk:JGab12

Routine removal of IPBE flag
Hello JGab12, as you have been inactive for over a year, we will be processing a routine removal of your IPBE flag, unless you have a specific use-case you can identify by replying here. Best regards, — xaosflux  Talk 18:39, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello, to follow up on the message above: this account flag has been removed for inactivity. Should you require this again in the future you may request by following the directions on this page: IP block exemption. Best regards, —  xaosflux  Talk 00:22, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Top ten male doubles tennis players templates
A number of "Top ten male doubles tennis players" templates, at least one of which you created, have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 27. Nigej (talk) 08:41, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Malika Auger-Aliassime for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Malika Auger-Aliassime is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Malika Auger-Aliassime until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bonoahx (talk) 14:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Charlotte Petrick for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charlotte Petrick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Charlotte Petrick& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bonoahx (talk) 15:46, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for History of the Ottawa Senators (1992–)
History of the Ottawa Senators (1992–) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm Talk 02:51, 30 December 2023 (UTC)