User talk:JGoodwin88

Speedy deletion nomination of Chepstow Leisure Centre


A tag has been placed on Chepstow Leisure Centre, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. --- Angel from PAKISTAN  Let's talk about it! 15:43, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Chepstow Leisure Centre
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for taking the time to contribute.

I'm a bot designed by another Wikipedia editor, and I'm here to help you with our deletion process. I noticed that while working on an article recently, you removed a speedy deletion template that tagged it for deletion. Don't get discouraged! Deletion discussions happen on Wikipedia all the time.

If you don't want the article to get deleted, please [ click here].

The link will take you to the talk page, where you can explain why the article should be kept. If you have any questions about this or need help with editing, you can ask at the Help desk.

We really hope you'll stick around to help make Wikipedia better! Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 15:50, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Chepstow Leisure Centre. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 15:54, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Chepstow Leisure Centre, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 16:04, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Monmouthshire Libraries


A tag has been placed on Monmouthshire Libraries requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. --- Angel from PAKISTAN  Let's talk about it! 16:13, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Status and Advice
As reviewing administrator, I removed the speedy tag. It was too soon for it to have been added Please complete the article, though: add the names of the libraries & some information about them, and give references. A combination article on the libraries in a country or other region is a perfectly reasonable topic. I shall explain things to the people who mark for deletion before giving you a chance. I advise you to fix the problem very quickly, before the article gets nominated for deletion by a regular deletion process. And always add a reference at the very first edit, to avoid this happening again.  DGG ( talk ) 17:49, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Abergavenny Leisure Centre


The article Abergavenny Leisure Centre has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mean as custard (talk) 16:39, 20 March 2012 (UTC)


 * again, you need to add some references; I'm not sure it will be possible here, most such centres are not notable. It would be a good idea to always make sure you have the references in hand before even starting the article.  DGG ( talk ) 18:13, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi!
Just to introduce myself - we obviously have overlapping areas of interest in article editing, and if I can be of any help please feel free to drop me a note. Regards, Ghmyrtle (talk) 10:39, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Caldicot Leisure Centre


The article Caldicot Leisure Centre has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Already deleted once; notability not established

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!}  (Whisper...) 16:06, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Monmouth Leisure Centre for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Monmouth Leisure Centre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Monmouth Leisure Centre until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Purpleback pack  89  ≈≈≈≈  16:39, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Abergavenny Leisure Centre for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abergavenny Leisure Centre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Abergavenny Leisure Centre until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Purpleback pack  89  ≈≈≈≈  20:48, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chepstow Leisure Centre


The article Chepstow Leisure Centre has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not anything notable about the place

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!}  (Whisper...) 09:40, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Monmouthshire Libraries


The article Monmouthshire Libraries has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Notability not established. Just a list of towns in which libraries are located.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Total-MAdMaN (talk) 09:03, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Monmouthshire Libraries for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Monmouthshire Libraries is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Monmouthshire Libraries until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.