User talk:JJH1992

Pussycat Dolls
They are Pop and R&B. Pop is first then R&B. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charmed36 (talk • contribs) 22:23, November 20, 2006

Edit summary
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this: The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. --Geniac 16:34, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

PCD
No one is bothering with PCD's genre. I'm not worrying about you being wrong. I have better articles to contribute with correct information. Charmed36 02:41, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ShadowHalo 00:18, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

The Pussycat Dolls Genre.
Why have you undone my edit? The Pussycat Dolls aren't just hip-hop: they are a mixture. Where are you getting your information from? Acalamari 21:26, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:PCD.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:PCD.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 20:11, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Danity.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Danity.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:58, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:PCD.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:PCD.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:41, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:PCD2.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:PCD2.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:31, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Images
You can't use an album cover in the infobox of The Pussycat Dolls because it's being used to illustrate the band, not the album. So the box must use a free image (that concert pic there now is free) instead. Free images can be user-made (taking a picture of The Pussycat Dolls in person) or asking permission to use someone else's self-made photo (that concert pic, for example). Also, publicity photos (like Image:PCD2.gif) can't be used either; they are believed to be copyright violations. If you want to replace the concert photo, you need to find another free image. Crumbsucker 02:50, 13 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Wallpapers aren't free. By "self-made," I mean you see the PCD in person yourself and take a picture yourself. The images on the page now are fine. Maybe better free images will come along later, but getting a replacement is not urgent. Crumbsucker 08:48, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:PCD3.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:PCD3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:32, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Ride_4_U.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Ride_4_U.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 10:18, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Jessica.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jessica.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 17:08, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

March 2007
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Two Pints of Lager and a Packet of Crisps on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. - Denny 22:43, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Regarding edits made during March 11 2007
Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Majorly  (o rly?) 19:16, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to remove content from pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Mel Etitis ( Talk ) 21:03, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Geniac 03:39, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Block
You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. --Mel Etitis ( Talk ) 10:49, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:CASCADA.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:CASCADA.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 20:08, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

mmh ...
I'll revert as often as you use " " within the infoboxes .... - Noboyo

PCD (album)
With all respect, you're at each other's throats over formatting. This can't be the most healthy thing to get worked up about, so would you be willing to, say, put it to a vote, or other way of moving forward, and try to get on amicably over your shared interest in Rhythm and Blues? Adam Cuerden talk 18:28, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Her Name Is Nicole
Please don't replace the (correctly used) en-rule with a hyphen flanked by spaces. --Mel Etitis ( Talk ) 18:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Punctuation
Song/single titles are in inverted commas, album titles are in italics. --Mel Etitis ( Talk ) 17:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Gwen Stefani
I've reverted your edit to Gwen Stefani, which undid several previous edits, including the addition of references. If you disagree with the formatting in the infobox, please bring it up at the article's talk page. ShadowHalo 23:09, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Warning
Your edits are now becoming disruptive; you are repeatedly returning articles to non-Wikipedia format, despite being warned. If you continue to do this, you will be blocked from editing. --Mel Etitis ( Talk ) 17:43, 25 March 2007 (UTC)


 * "Why revert?" you ask. Because, as I and other people have explained to you, you're changing articles from correct Wikipedia style to incorrect. My warning still stands. --Mel Etitis  ( Talk ) 20:42, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy, by 31 hours. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org.

This is for edit warring on Danity Kane, Danity Kane (album), and PCD (album) after an intervention and mediation to try and settle it. Adam Cuerden talk 21:17, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy, by 60 hours. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. Achieve consensus first. You've done it again Adam Cuerden talk 15:06, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Do a poll, establish or demonstrate a guideline is established, whatever, but don't touch the formatting again without getting consensus. Adam Cuerden talk 15:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy, by 1 week. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. And you're at it again. Why do you insist on reverting articles to states that are out of line with both the MoS and the relevant WikiProjects, all without even the courtesy of explanation or discussion? --Mel Etitis ( Talk ) 12:32, 2 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Please do not remove warnings. Just follow the rules and everyone will get along, ok? Kaisershatner 16:28, 5 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Ditto. It is considered vandalism. Eventually, if you want to reform and hide your past history of abuse, you can tuck it in an WP:ARCHIVE, but removing recent warnings will not help you get along here. Danski14(talk) 17:09, 5 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi. There's no conflict here.  See:  Wiki users have a right to know about your history of warnings, blocks, etc., which is why you shouldn't remove them, and you don't own your Talk page.  On the other hand, if you just edit constructively going forward, no one will care at all about your early difficulties.  Best wishes, Kaisershatner 17:13, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. --Mel Etitis ( Talk ) 19:56, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:PCDLogo.jpeg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you uploaded the same image twice: as Image:PCDLogo.jpeg and also as Image:PCDLogo.JPEG. The latter copy of the file has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 17:16, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Pussycat Dolls Discussion.
I've started a discussion [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Pussycat_Dolls#Discussion_Over_The_Current_Edits. here] over the current reverts to the article. Acalamari 19:08, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:PussycatDolls.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:PussycatDolls.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mel Etitis ( Talk ) 20:16, 20 April 2007 (UTC) --Mel Etitis  ( Talk ) 20:16, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Some evidence that the images are actually free would be helpful. - Mike Rosoft 20:27, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Some Links.
You should read the following links: WP:3RR, WP:TALK, WP:ICT, and WP:IUP. You will find them very helpful. I am giving you these links because you have been blocked five times; future blocks will be longer, or worse, indefinite. Acalamari 23:14, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Civility.
This edit summary here is totally unacceptable. Please read WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. As for the format of the page, saying that that way looks better is not a valid reason to revert my edits. Read the discussions on Talk: Pussycat Dolls to do with the format as well please. Acalamari 17:12, 12 June 2007 (UTC)


 * You may to see this WikiProject: WikiProject Musicians, and this page Template:Infobox musical artist. Acalamari 17:20, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Why do you continue to revert me when I have explained to you about the infoboxes and given you these links? Acalamari 16:13, 15 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Please see this AN/I discussion about this. Acalamari 23:52, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

June 2007.
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Acalamari 20:35, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
I have blocked you for 48 hours because you have continued to make edits without discussion, further to that you have used rather incivil edit summaries in recent days after plenty of warnings and previous blocked. Please take a look at the manual of style before you return.  Ry an P os tl et hw ai te  00:19, 17 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I have increased the time to a month, because you've been doing this exact same thing, on the exact same pages every single time I've dealt with you. This is getting beyond ridiculous, and if you do this once more, I suggest that you be permanently banned. Adam Cuerden talk 02:50, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Infobox formats
Please stop changing the formats of infoboxes to an incorrect format. Commas, not breaks, are used in the infoboxes you keep changing. You have been blocked several times for introducing incorrect formatting to infoboxes, and your recent block was a month long. Again, I ask you, please stop changing them. Acalamari 01:54, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, please see Template: Infobox musical artist. You'll see that commas, not breaks, are used. Acalamari 01:59, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Quite. Can you please stop that? If you keep doing it, without getting consensus, I'm going to have to block you again. Adam Cuerden talk 02:09, 20 August 2007 (UTC)


 * To begin with, I suggest you take a look at WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. You'll find them to be a very good read.
 * Secondly, you continue to edit infoboxes so they become out of the standard format. You also edit section/sub-section titles to put in unnecessary capitalizing. These edits are disruptive, and don't need to be done. You've been asked several times by different users to stop. Again, I ask you, please stop these edits. As for the music video summary, you didn't add any sources, and it was original research. Acalamari 16:21, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:B8e6 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:B8e6 1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:54, 20 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 19:54, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
I see your uncivil edit summaries and edit warring have continued unabated and you continue to show no evidence that you are going to mend your ways. You have now been blocked indefinitely. As per WP:BLOCK and WP:SOCK, you are not permitted to create any new account to continue editing. --Yamla 19:58, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Lobster.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Lobster.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:12, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Hollyoaks locations for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Hollyoaks locations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Hollyoaks locations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 16:35, 1 November 2019 (UTC)