User talk:JJLeahy

Hi! This is my talk page. Feel free to leave me a message below. (I'd prefer messages be left at the bottom of this list. Thanks in advance.)

thanks!
thanks! (-Lilath) I think that you should call your radio station --radio free america--since the main stream media has lost their desire to get to the bottom of the truth and accept lies wholesale

Hi JJLeahy :)
Thank you for your comment on the redirection for Aprotic Acids! (I was wondering, where should I normally reply? on my talk page? yours? The acid's discussion page?) Anat 04:02, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

Thanks from Mokus
Thanks for your message regarding the Tel Aviv Haifa highway. I was looking for a way to delete the page or mark it for deletion but I was in a bit of a hurry so I gave up.

I have a random Wikipedia page as my homepage, which is how I came to stumble over that particular page.

Mokus 08:27, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

MP3 Newswire
Hi JJLeahy,

I put up notes to the MP3 Newswire deletion that details my reasoning as to how I set up those articles. The technique I was using was trying to create a time-capsule of articles on Archive.org as a research tool. Take a look at the notes and give me your feedback on the idea. We can adjust where we need to.

Best

Mp3hist

Sandbox
The header isn't being maintained because User:Sandbot is ill. User:Uncle G's 'bot has taken up some of the slack, but not that particular part. Uncle G 19:40:41, 2005-08-10 (UTC)

Atromeroptic Law vfd
Thank you for voting to delete this entry! Hfwd 05:33, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

Thanks from Junglist
Hi and thanks for the welcoming :) Its great wiki has dedicated members like you. Junglist 10:53, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

Concerning the double-bell euphonium
Hello. Sorry for my abominably slow response. As for the tone quality of the extra bell on the double-belled euphonium, I have actually played a real specimen at the Band Museum in my city. (this one may actually be the one I played). I am good friends with the owner of the museum. After playing it for a bit, I noticed that there was really no difference in the tone quality between the two bells; the second bell only seemed a bit tinnier and harder to push air through, not really trombone-like. It was at this point that the owner (who has considerable knowledge, having run this museum for many decades, amassing quite a large collection of instruments) informed me that the extra bell was really no more than a novelty. I suspect that you may be right about the tone difference being really no more than a flaw. What do you think? Diagonalfish 02:52, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

almost surely

 * The locution almost surely is to probability theory as almost everywhere is to measure theory.

Why in the world would you change "locution" to "location" and call it a spelling correction? I'd have thought "locution" was rather obviously what was intended and "location" is obviously wrong. Michael Hardy 02:25, 18 December 2005 (UTC)


 * My apologies; I wasn’t thinking at the time and looking back I have no idea what I meant or why I edited it. Thank you for catching my error. -JJLeahy 02:40, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

OK. Michael Hardy 04:24, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:CU header
A tag has been placed on Template:CU header requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:01, 8 March 2008 (UTC)