User talk:JJMartinez69

September 2021
Hello, I'm FormalDude. Your recent edit(s) to the page Conor McGregor appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   –– FormalDude   talk  04:59, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Conor McGregor. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox.   –– FormalDude  talk  19:20, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Conor McGregor, you may be blocked from editing.   –– FormalDude  talk  05:54, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of UFC events.  Cassiopeia  talk  20:58, 11 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi, Re: Vitor Belfort the bout is an exhibition bout pls see existing source at the bottom of the table and btw twitter is not a reliable source. Pls do not change it back. Cassiopeia  talk  08:05, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at UFC 246, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Cassiopeia  talk  00:12, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 01:08, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at UFC 272, you may be blocked from editing.  Cassiopeia  talk  07:19, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

March 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Conor McGregor, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''Please do not change the second fight or third fight with Dustin Poirier's results. See McGregor's talk page as to why.''  ♡RAFAEL♡(talk) 07:02, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Conor McGregor, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  Cassiopeia  talk  03:41, 21 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Pls note that the mma fighter fight method is as per Sherdog based on Wikipedia MMA guidlines - see here Conor fight record at Sherdog]. Pls do not interpret the method yourlsef. Cassiopeia</b>  talk  03:42, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
 * then why is Poirier 2 listed as KO JJMartinez69 (talk) 02:25, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
 * pls read the fight records again. Both were TKO. UFC 264 was TKO (Leg Injury) and UFC 178 was TKO (Punches).<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FF8000"> Cassiopeia</b>  talk  03:17, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Um, i'm referring to sherdog listing it as a KO (punches) on UFC 257 opposed to wikipedia's listing; but regardless of that. Alvarez vs. McGregor was officially ranked as a KO not a TKO due to punches announced by Bruce Buffer, please do refer to the post-fight interview with Conor McGregor around 0:30 mark; youtube.Buffer. JJMartinez69 (talk) 16:53, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Again, need "independent, reliable source" to support the claim and not in UFC related channgel especially not in Yourtube for they are considered not independent or not reliable source. Sherdog is used for fight method for the MMA fighter fight record section. source can be found at the bottom of the fight table..<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FF8000"> Cassiopeia</b>  talk  03:44, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 * youtube is not reliable? Do you even hear what your saying; i am literally sourcing the offical result from the UFC; not sherdogs 3rd-party bollocks 😭 JJMartinez69 (talk) 04:20, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Again, this is Wikipedia and the guidelines as follow. Any sources that is associated, affiliated, connected to the subject is considered not independent which mean UFC sources in regardless in Utube or the web page is considered not independent. sherdog is independent, reliable source and that is the source we would use in Wikipedia. Social media is considered not reliable or not independent sources and not to be used in Wikipedia to support the content claim and Sherdog is the source for the fight methods and infobox of the fighters as per Wikipedia MMA guidlines. There are links which have been posted to your on the warning messages above and pls read them.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FF8000"> Cassiopeia</b>  talk  01:23, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok. Based off those guidelines, label Poirier 2 as KO (Punches) as it is on Sherdog, stay consistent; if you won't. Label Alvarez/McGregor how it is and how it was officially announced by the ref and stop going around the bush; stop acting like you don't know what i'm talking about because quite frankly its cringe. JJMartinez69 (talk) 01:48, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Pls be aware to comment on the subject matter and not attack the editor for that you receive a warning and subsequent blocked from editing and take this as the warning. Be note that Wikipedia is not about the truth but about verification of the independent, reliable source. There are fight methods which I disagree with the source but this is Wikiedia and it is not based on any of the editor opinions or views. If you want to edit Wikipedia then adhere to the guidelines and be polite and civil when interacting with other editors.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FF8000"> Cassiopeia</b>  talk  02:58, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi. To keep this short and sweet; McGregor vs Poirier 2 is listed as a TKO because a discussion was raised on |Conor McGregor's talk page to change the result from a KO because the majority of reliable sources had it listed as TKO. This consensus was near unanimous. If you want fight results changed, it's as simple as raising a discussion on a talk page, but of course you must provide independent, and reliable sources to support your arguments. Also please be civil, nobody is trying to fight you. <b style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:110%;color:#E285FF"> ♡RAFAEL♡</b>(<b style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color#FF00FF">talk</b>) 05:18, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Conor McGregor, you may be blocked from editing. <b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FF8000"> Cassiopeia</b>  talk  00:28, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of UFC 291


The article UFC 291 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Event was never announced and the only source used was based on speculation and does not exist anymore. Article should be created when solid sources are uploaded."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 04:02, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Hey, there's not a single solid thing related to UFC 291 out there. You can't create an article based on speculations. The date has not been confirmed for the event, let alone a location. The article should be deleted and recreated once something concrete is announced. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 04:04, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

UFC 291 moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, UFC 291, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 17:22, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Conor McGregor, you may be blocked from editing. <b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FF8000"> Cassiopeia</b>  talk  02:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
Hello, I'm CeltBrowne. I noticed that you recently removed content from Superteams in the National Basketball Association without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CeltBrowne (talk) 16:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Conor McGregor, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Nswix (talk) 14:55, 24 January 2024 (UTC)


 * cry about it buddy its the correct information, maybe read instead of trying to act like you have a job JJMartinez69 (talk) 16:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Nswix (talk) 17:23, 24 January 2024 (UTC)


 * im sure JJMartinez69 (talk) 17:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Superteams
I believe the Cavaliers shouldn't be categorized as a superteam, for many reasons; being that Kevin Love did not perform up to expectations during the tenure with LeBron James & Kyrie Irving. We should base superteams off play, not expectations. And in there sole championship season, Kevin Love averaged 8 PPG & 8 RPG on 31% FG in the NBA Finals. Nowhere near a star-level player. Thats just my two cents JJMartinez69 (talk) 17:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)