User talk:JJMhonest 2020

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alina Padikkal (September 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alina Padikkal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alina Padikkal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Alina_Padikkal Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan_arndt&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Alina_Padikkal reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 09:11, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

.. (The Subject Alina padkkal is most notable in south india,i have made reliable references to prove the notability and the coverage of the subject..No reviewer is ready to spend some time on checking the references.we have been trying to create this article since 2018,why cant the reviewer show some patience for checking the reliability of the Subject.....It shouldnt be deleted . THIS ARTICLE SHOULD BE APPROVED...KINDLY GO THROUGH THE REFERENCES JJMhonest 2020 (talk) 14:09, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Draft:Alina Padikkal—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 18:27, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Please delete the page i made another JJMhonest 2020 (talk) 11:40, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Alina Padikkal has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alina Padikkal. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 22:35, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Please publish the article....I have attached all the relaible sources of the subject coverage JJMhonest 2020 (talk) 04:55, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alina Padikkal (October 5)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Salimfadhley was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alina Padikkal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alina Padikkal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Alina_Padikkal Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Salimfadhley&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Alina_Padikkal reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Salimfadhley (talk) 10:20, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

I have attached all the evidence of the subjects reliability and coverage.... May i know the reason in specific for the declination JJMhonest 2020 (talk) 11:34, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

I have attached all the sources and proof of the articles notability in south india in the references... Kindly go through that and give approval JJMhonest 2020 (talk) 11:49, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Please Check the references.. It shows the proof of popularity JJMhonest 2020 (talk) 14:01, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alina Padikkal


The article Alina Padikkal has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not satisfy acting notability or general notability. See previous deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Alina Padikkal. There is also a draft.  The draft can be kept."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:51, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Alina Padikkal for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alina Padikkal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alina Padikkal& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:57, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

It shoudnt be deleted the subject is qulaified for article check the references JJMhonest 2020 (talk) 05:00, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Iam the one created both thats why 2 nomination....

I have attached all sources in the reference which shows the reliability and popularity of the subject JJMhonest 2020 (talk) 05:09, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alina Padikkal, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Fiddle  Faddle  11:01, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Fiddle  Faddle  12:20, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Salimfadhley (talk) 12:49, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:Albinjose636&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Albinjose636. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. GeneralNotability (talk) 13:49, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

I dont understand whats happening... You blocked with out any proper reason... Iam using only one account... JJMhonest 2020 (talk) 14:05, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Albinjose is not me JJMhonest 2020 (talk) 20:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alina Padikkal (October 9)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Alina_Padikkal Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This draft has been resubmitted without any visible improvement, or with very little improvement. If you do not know what is needed to improve this draft, please ask for advice rather than making minor improvements and resubmitting.

You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the declining reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)

If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it is likely to be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a topic-ban may even be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.

This draft has been Rejected by a reviewer in the Articles for Creation review process. DO NOT resubmit this draft or attempt to resubmit this draft or prepare or submit a draft that is substantially the same as this draft without discussing the reasons for the rejection. You may request a discussion with the rejecting reviewer, or you may request a discussion with the community at the Teahouse. A discussion will not necessarily agree to a resubmission. If this draft is resubmitted, or an attempt is made to resubmit this draft or an equivalent draft, without addressing the reasons for the Rejection, a topic-ban or a partial block may be requested against the submitting editor, and the draft may be nominated for deletion.

You may ask for advice about Rejection at the Teahouse.

Regardless of whether this draft will be speedily deleted, or deleted after discussion, or kept in draft space, it is insulting to the reviewers and the Wikipedia community to resubmit it.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:49, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Mistake
I am new to Wikipedia.i created one account in Mobile and one in laptop....May be it's a mistake...I don't know anything about Wikipedia editing...I didn't check whether I am logged in with same account...I usually click history and go through page JJMhonest 2020 (talk) 20:08, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * This seems unlikely based upon Sockpuppet investigations/Albinjose636. Creation of a second account might be an error, but not this many. I am not an administrator. If I were I would not be lifting any block based upon what you have said here so far
 * Please place on this page filling ut your reason for unblock. I doubt any admin will look further at this unless you do.  Fiddle   Faddle  20:15, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Will I be in jail JJMhonest 2020 (talk) 20:19, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , I think that is best ignored. You either do what is required or don't. Either way Wikipedia will continue, whether you persuade an admin to lift a block or not Fiddle   Faddle  20:22, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

I didn't create many accounts JJMhonest 2020 (talk) 20:22, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

What are the consequences of this case.. JJMhonest 2020 (talk) 20:41, 9 October 2020 (UTC)