User talk:JJRambo

Post a message to JJRambo

Hmm...
Hello JJRambo. You seem rather familiar with Wikipedia for a new editor. Just sayin'... --Shirt58 (talk) 01:15, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Mangoeater1000 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. 72Dino (talk) 21:02, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Robert G. Brown


A tag has been placed on Robert G. Brown requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Marco Guzman, Jr Talk  01:14, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

a Teahouse invitation]]


 * Comment I've been informed. In fact, I'm all too well informed about the situation here.  This editor should remain blocked, and talk page access revoked,  and I think all single purpose editors appearing from nowhere to engage with the NYU-Poly articles (or or the CSU-Pomona articles) should at this point be blocked on sight.  And it's time to consider semi-protecting afd discussions as well as articles.  DGG ( talk ) 20:41, 10 December 2012 (UTC)