User talk:JK.Kite/Archive 3

Recent edits to Ismail ibn Musa Menk
Hello. I noticed that you made an edit that introduces praise or promotional language to the Ismail ibn Musa Menk article. On Wikipedia, we adhere to a neutral point of view (NPOV) and avoid promotional language or puffery. Please read the NPOV policy page, as well as this page of language to avoid to better understand how to expand this article in a style suitable to an encyclopedia. If you have questions, please see the Help Desk page. Thank you! DemocraticLuntz (talk) 20:41, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks I was just trying to fix minor issues and adding missing information. I fully understand and read out the policies and assure you that I'll neutralize and remove promotional language from pages I came across thanks :) JK.Kite (talk) 13:59, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Ahmass Fakahany moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Ahmass Fakahany, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your page to draft space (with a prefix of  before the article title) where you can work on it with minimal disruption. When you feel that it meets our notability and neutrality requirements, and is thus ready for mainspace, please submit it using the Articles for Creation template on the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:28, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Kurtis Lee Thomas for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kurtis Lee Thomas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kurtis Lee Thomas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 20:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, JK.Kite, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * Best practices for editors with close associations
 * Plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! —Unforgettableid (talk) 12:58, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Violin Guild


A tag has been placed on The Violin Guild, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. —Unforgettableid (talk) 12:58, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Hello JK.Kite. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:JK.Kite. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. —Unforgettableid (talk) 12:59, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Ahmass Fakahany for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ahmass Fakahany is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ahmass Fakahany until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nathan2055talk - contribs 22:54, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Violin Guild


The article The Violin Guild has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG; likely created by a WP:UPE"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nathan2055talk - contribs 18:09, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of The Violin Guild for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Violin Guild is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Violin Guild until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 21:28, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:JK.Kite, and the template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Thank you! —Unforgettableid (talk) 06:17, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Notifictaion
I've left creating pages long ago. I worked on pages I liked and was a fan but then I thought I should not. I am only editing pages to the best of my Wikipedia policy knowledge. Fixing errors, adding references, removing irrelevant and promo info and trying my best to keep the Wikipedia cause of existence. Thank you JK.Kite (talk) 19:12, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello JK.Kite! Your additions to Ryan Kavanaugh have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 03:09, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Ok I will rewrite and fix the statement. I tried to reword it already but use my own words now. Also, please see this below message from a user, I think Ryan is paying multiple people to save his page from this news, I added that after seeing the history of the page that why it was locked. Then I found those sources from NYT and Variety. JK.Kite (talk) 17:40, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the message. Yes, please feel free to rewrite in your own words. I agree with your assessment of the article and have restored some previously removed information that was sourced to Variety. I appreciate your work on the article and your cool-headed response to the user below. DanCherek (talk) 18:30, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, I rewrote and checked plagiarism as well, hope its good now. And just to inform you that I added the same text written by you to the relevant Relativity Media page for the company as well. JK.Kite (talk) 21:12, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Paid to disseminate false and misleading info
Reporting you for malicious attack on Ryan Kavanaugh wiki especially since it is part of an ongoing legal dispute and you attempted to create a misleading and false conclusion with incomplete and stale publications, paid for by the H3 Podcast and Ethan Klein as part of a concentrated and deliberate smear campaign. RK777713 (talk) 08:45, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Please don't get offended, the things I mentioned were reported my the most credible sources that are NYT and Variety. I understand your COI with that page and actually you are being paid to keep the page clean, so please first learn the Wikipedia rules and policies. All published sources, good or bad could be added to Wikipedia. JK.Kite (talk) 17:40, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

You have not included accurate information. You have included information the H3 podcast has been trying to spread for their own financial gain which has been wholly refuted by reputable press since. No matter since H3 has been sued and that is what prompted this attack by them JK.Kite is being added to the suit and will be held responsible for causing intentional harm, painting a knowingly false light, libel and interference in contractual relations. So maybe I am not up to speed on wiki terms as to how to use the rules to slander, malign and harm someone but I certainly understand the law and now you have forced me to do so. RK777713 (talk) 07:07, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

To be clear I’m not being paid anything. It is me you are harming. RK777713 (talk) 07:08, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Paid To modify pages to harm people-initiating lawsuit
This party is part of an paid campaign to harm people on wiki. The suit will take some time but within a few weeks we will publish a copy which will name them and show their malicious and wholly misleading information. Wiki should be removing any privileges and bar them. RK777713 (talk) 07:21, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Hello, I'm FormalDude. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Ryan Kavanaugh seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. –– FormalDude  talk  22:38, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, JK.Kite. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Ryan Kavanaugh, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. –– FormalDude  talk  22:38, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Guadalupe Hayes-Mota
Hello, please use the Show changes button, before you Publish changes, see here. Regards --Serols (talk) 19:06, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Cullen328 (talk) 16:44, 1 December 2021 (UTC)