User talk:JKGREINEDER

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Hans-Ulrich Rudel has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alfie ↑↓ © 22:19, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Erich von Manstein. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Alfie ↑↓ © 22:23, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Erich Hartmann constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Alfie ↑↓ © 22:25, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Heinz-Wolfgang Schnaufer. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alfie ↑↓ © 22:26, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Michael Wittmann. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without  further notice. Alfie ↑↓ © 22:29, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Please discuss controversial edits with other users rather than repeating them ad-nauseum.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - Vianello (Talk) 22:34, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

```` J. K. GREINEDER, MD, MBA  -- 18 September 2010 -- 01:08 EDT

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

Thanks for blocking me. I now know that Big Brother (in the persons of 'Vianello' and 'Alfie') is watching. I have no idea on how to go about explaining my edits (or to whom), so I won't bother. My respect for Wikipedia has just crashed. It is obviously a forum to perpetuate silly propagandist formulae, by self-righteous know-nothings!

ADDENDUM -- 18 September 2010 -- 16:33 EDT

The author(s) of the articles on German WWII soldiers are engaging in the most scurrilous attacks on the integrity of these patriots. The German heroes who are described did NOT fight for Hitler or the NS-Party. They fought, bled, and died for "Volk und VaterlandItalic text" and full honor is their due. Wikipedia is abetting the vilest type of anti-German propaganda --- AND exercising censorship, to boot.

FYI --- There has NEVER been a country named "Nazi Germany" (or "Weimar Republic" for that matter) --- only one named "Deutschland" (with some variations based on prevailing political winds).

FYI (more) --- By allowing the egregious propagation of spurious 'facts,' Wikipedia is complicit in the degradation of our information system through manipulation of 'words.' Even one false word introduced into a sentence or a paragraph discredits the ENTIRE statement or argument.

I will never again make any contribution to Wikipedia (I had made two, apparently uncontroversial and not challenged) and will henceforth focus on Google for my informational excursions.

Wikipedia's 'watchdogs' and enforcers should be ashamed of themselves.
 * Or you could, perhaps, discuss changes rather than edit warring, like the temporary block notification suggested you would be able to continue to edit freely by doing. But I suppose that is more time-consuming than getting sanctimonious about it, it's true. See also: WP:The Truth. If by chance you want to make another monologue, you might also want to check out the article on "Fallacy of composition" so as not to repeat some of your logical pitfalls. But, if you're more interested in in trying to wrangle in your stance by "force", I think we'll manage quite well (and without shame) without your contributions. - Vianello (Talk) 00:48, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

22 July 2011 (request to unblock --- don’t know if I did it right) I objected to derogatory characterization of ALL German WW II soldiers as "Nazis" --- an offensive act by authors who know not what they do. Since there is no Editorial Board (a grievous omission), I have/had no way to address this systematic insult to German soldiers who (like normal patriots) fought for "Volk und Vaterland." I do not regret what I did (remove the "Nazi" from the 'allegiance') --- and this whole disgusting episode is sticking in my craw. FYI --- there has NEVER been a country named "Nazi Germany" --- or "Weimar Republic" --- only "Deutsches Reich" (1871--1945) or Deutschland (Germany) for short. If you want to continue to wallow in your benighted condition, be my guest. Even if you restore my editing privileges (I had made two previous--unchallenged--contributions) I will not participate in, or promote, Wikipedia until these insults to one of the best Armed Forces on the planet cease. The ball is in your court. Juergen K. Greineder, MD, MBA (born in the Reichshauptstadt Berlin)