User talk:JMF/Archives/2019/December

Euston station
Thank you for your note. My sources are public domain, a mix of Flickr, Getty and RIBA photos of 1968-69 and later, and some history and architecture commentaries such as hydeparknow.com. My proficiency at citing is poor, and it is particularly difficult on a ‘phone, but I will try to add these sources. My interest is to try to draw out how the station frontage area has been modified over the years and highlight some significant design differences versus other major termini. There doesn’t seem to be one article covering all of this, hence a mix of sources. I am happy for things to be marked citation required pending getting in the references which I agree are needed. Yours, Saval Saval (talk) 14:09, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, I understand what you are doing and agree in principle that it needs saying. The problem in practice is that, since the article is rated WP:Good article, so text with 'citation required' won't be allowed to stand. To move things on and so that you don't get discouraged, I suggest you use the article talk page to post a draft of your proposed text: no-one will delete it there and you might even get help finding the citations.--John Maynard Friedman (talk) 20:32, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Ah, understand the page rating point. Will have a go on the article talk page. Many thanks. Yours, Saval — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saval (talk • contribs) 13:37, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

thanks for your idea
thanks for your idea. we added the material that you suggested. it is at 2019_in_United_Kingdom_politics_and_government. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 01:33, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Interceptor ditch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Runoff ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Interceptor_ditch check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Interceptor_ditch?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:15, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Supersession vs Supercession
Hi, There's some discussion here. Doing a google search for site:uk Supersession gives 59,300 results while site:uk Supercession gives 2,040 results. Making the site gov.uk moves the balance to 9,630 results vs 68 results. I'm still inclined to think Supercession is wrong but I've no great attachment. Cavrdg (talk) 12:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Well I never... The OED quote persuades me that wp:ENGVAR is not relevant. I will reinstate your edit. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 14:43, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Cheers. Cavrdg (talk) 16:32, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Welcome
Hi John. Thank you for your kind message. When I began editing Wikipedia, I found this feature where the algorithm would automatically find a random article that requires improvement at the click of a button. However, I can no longer find where this is. Any ideas? Also, is there a way for me to find (for example) mathematics articles that need improvement, as the Community Portal seems to find articles of any kind. Thanks TentativeTypist (talk) 17:10, 23 December 2019 (UTC)