User talk:JMott2/sandbox

The information is given very well and clearly. However, there are a few spelling errors that need to go back and be fixed. Also, the sources are reliable and legitimate but need to be cited more. There are a few sentences that give numerical and historical information that aren't cited, and could be seen as taking a source's words as your own. Other than than, the entry is engaging and neutral. Also add some hyperlinks to other Wikipedia articles.