User talk:JOHNNY BIANCHINO

June 2017
You are not permitted to blank prior unblock declines for active blocks, as you did to mine. Please do not do that again, or we will have to revoke your talk page access. You may also want to elaborate as to why we should believe your claim that this account has nothing to do with Jbianc3044, given the obvious username similarities. --Yamla (talk) 01:37, 28 June 2017 (UTC) (Plus, of course, the fact that both this account and Jbianc3044 have operated from the same computer or at least, the same IP address) --Yamla (talk) 01:38, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.