User talk:JP8077

Welcome!

Hello, JP8077, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Jamie Watson (actor), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Barret (talk) 16:15, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion of "Jamie Watson (actor)"
A page you created, Jamie Watson (actor), has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Barret (talk) 16:15, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Note
To deny recognition to blocked users, we generally delete their userpages some time after they're blocked unless it contains information that would be helpful to others (such as if they're known to be making sockpuppets). The users you've been adding pages for are not really like that, so they don't need to (and shouldn't) have pages. In general there's really no reason to ever create a userpage for someone else, blocked or not, so please don't do it.  — Soap  —  18:16, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of June Jago


A tag has been placed on June Jago requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 20:21, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Paddy O'Brien (country singer)


The article Paddy O'Brien (country singer) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Pam D  21:03, 18 September 2013 (UTC) Ok User:PamD I'll recreate the article with importance and significance.

Speedy deletion nomination of Paddy O'Brien (country singer)


A tag has been placed on Paddy O'Brien (country singer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Pam D  21:06, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

December 2014
Hello, I'm K6ka. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Honoré de Balzac because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. --I am  k6ka  Talk to me!   See what I have done  12:13, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Specter of Newby Church
Hello JP8077,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Specter of Newby Church for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Oceangreenn (talk) 19:55, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bob Harrington (preacher)


The article Bob Harrington (preacher) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Spyder_Monkey (Talk) 23:15, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Category:Christian fundamentalists
Please stop adding this category to articles which do not confirm the accuracy of this category. Quis separabit? 18:38, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * You have caused other editors considerable work and effort removing these categories from articles where they never belonged. It is clear your editing was in very bad faith. Quis separabit?  23:08, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Vandalism warning (July 2016)
If you continue editing disruptively, as you did with Category:Christian fundamentalists, you will be blocked from editing. Quis separabit? 23:08, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 18:13, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Chris Troutman ( talk ) 19:49, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Yes, but I have acknowledged that. As I said, my edits were constructive, I wasn't vandalising articles, why should I not be trusted again when I acknowledge that I have done wrong and used sock accounts? JP8077(Matthew Thughorn&#93;&#93; (talk) 23:45, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Let's remember, you created a bunch of junk categories against consensus and CATGENDER. You've never been a constructive editor. You've created at least 14 socks and only a fool would trust you. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:04, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
 * User's edits appear to be good faith to me. I'd give them another chance. Tkwikihelper (talk) 21:31, 29 August 2017 (UTC)