User talk:JPMLTD

June 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to St. Elmo's Fire (film) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

facebookId.map(id => s"https://www.instagram.com/explore/locations/$id/").toSeq ),     forceUrl = Some(url), // This is to ensure that the igGraphId that gets found will force the listing to look correct.ormation About False Positives|mistakes]], but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few [[User:ClueBot NG#Inf getAlternateListingUrls = Some(
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: St. Elmo's Fire (film) was changed by JPMLTD (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.875542 on 2013-06-01T07:54:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:54, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

February 2014
Hello, JPMLTD. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article John Parr, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

Please do not add or change content, as you did to John Parr, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 01:58, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to John Parr, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 00:19, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at John Parr, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Anupmehra - Let's talk!  18:23, 16 February 2014 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 22:42, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

=*** WARNING ***= Please stop assuming ownership of articles as you did at John Parr. Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive and could lead to edit wars and personal attacks, and is a violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dl2000 (talk) 23:38, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at John Parr, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dl2000 (talk) 23:38, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 02:20, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of Three days for continuing to remove relevant maintenance tags, as you did at John Parr. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. SmartSE (talk) 13:52, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Advice
Hi JPMLTD. You have continued to ignore the warnings that other editors have left you and continued to edit disruptively. If you wish to make useful contributions here, please read WP:BESTCOI which contains useful advice for editors in your position. I would strongly advise that you refrain from editing John Parr directly in the future and instead make suggestions on the article's talk page instead for others to review. The best idea would be for you to find any link to any sources which discuss Parr's career in detail, similar to this article in Billboard. Content on Wikipedia has to have already been published elsewhere and if you continue editing as if you own the article you will likely be blocked for longer. Please reply below if you have any questions (you can still edit this page while you are blocked). Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 14:10, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:81.131.199.124, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Drm310 (talk) 19:04, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Final warning for unsourced edits
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:54, 7 January 2021 (UTC)