User talk:JPSepu96

Speedy deletion nomination of Agustin Radagast
Hello JPSepu96,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Agustin Radagast for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

 Onel 5969  TT me 16:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Agustin Radagast
Hello JPSepu96,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Agustin Radagast for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

 Onel 5969  TT me 17:34, 19 February 2017 (UTC)


 * JPSepu96, I read your note on the talk page of Agustin Radagast. However, the page is most certainly promotional in nature, and I had to delete it. You need to read WP:N, WP:RS, and especially WP:NOTPROMO, carefully, before editing further. Vanamonde (talk) 06:05, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Agustin Radagast. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Home Lander (talk) 19:31, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Agustin Radagast for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Agustin Radagast is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Agustin Radagast until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)