User talk:JPaestpreornJeolhlna

Welcome to Wikipedia!

ƎⱭIƧЯƎHTO
I've created ƎⱭIƧЯƎHTO per your request; apparently the person at WP:AFC/R who declined it hadn't looked at the article. Thanks for all of your useful requests! Nyttend (talk) 16:15, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

The Teahouse Turns One!
It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!


 * --Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:29, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles/Redirects listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Articles/Redirects. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:Articles/Redirects redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). — rybec   08:50, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Your redirect request with target small caps
I'm going to ANI to ask an administrator to create the redirect.

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

FROWN and SMILE
You recently redirected ⌢ and ⌣ to Frown and Smile with the reasoning that characters should redirect to their meanings. I completely agree and I do the same thing. However, those two articles are not about the technical symbols which they coincidentally resemble; see Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 December 17. The best solution would be to determine what these symbols actually mean, but failing that, I think they should redirect to their block’s article. Gorobay (talk) 14:27, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Spacing in punctuation
As I can see, most of you edits are competent, but [ this one] is not. If you prefer “—”, then it may not be spaced in English-language punctuation. If you leave both spaces at their place, then an en dash “ – ” is the only possibility. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 08:47, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
'''-- [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Riley_Huntley/You_missed! Cheers, ] Ri l ey   ''' 20:16, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Equals sign, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ≚ (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

ꔀ listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ꔀ. Since you had some involvement with the ꔀ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Also nominating the other 299 Unicode Vai character redirects you created. BabelStone (talk) 20:44, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

ꔀ listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ꘿. Since you had some involvement with the ꘿ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Also nominating the other 19 redirects for Unicode reserved code points in the Vai block that you created. BabelStone (talk) 21:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

What consistency?
What "consistency" you are refering to? Your own changes and then keep saying these pages are consistent? -DePiep (talk) 00:18, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
 * It would be nice to have a single page to discuss changes relating to all the Unicode chart templates. I agree that consistency is important—it was consistent before JPaestpreornJeolhlna changed the casing of "reserved" and "control" to "Reserved" and "Control", and it is consistent now that the changes have been made to all (?) the templates. The question is which capitalization is best.  It was me who originally added the character names and "reserved", "control" and "not a character" annotations to the templates, taken from the Unicode Character Data file where character names are all upper case and "reserved", "control" and "not a character" are all lower case. However, I don't see any reason not to capitalize "reserved", "control" and "not a character" to "Reserved", "Control" and "Not a character" on Wikipedia when used as titles.  You could also make a case for capitalizing character names rather than using all upper case (e.g. "Latin Capital Letter A" or "Latin capital letter A" instead of "LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A", but in very many cases it would be problematic to decide which words to capitalize and which not, so I would prefer to stick with all upper case character names. BabelStone (talk) 08:44, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
 * "reserved", "control" and "not a character" are not Unicode names. "Latin capital letter A" is. To prevent this confusion, Unicode option is to write " ", " " and " " respectively. Also Unicode states that these words are written lowercase. See chapter 4, Code Point Labels. Actually the word used is "noncharacter" not "not a character", but this may be allowed by Unicode defining "not a character" as a variant, somewhere. -DePiep (talk) 12:49, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi, DePiep and BabelStone; thank you for bringing up your concern on this matter. To begin, I am very aware of the character entitling system used by Unicode for control character, reserved character, and non-character code points, by which these titles are left uncapitalized and placed between less-than and greater-than signs. However, capitalizing these titles (and disregarding the bracket-like usage of "<" and ">") in charts within Wikipedia is more appropriate, as these are independent titles of table positions. It is a rather unusual and arguably incorrect format to leave these titles not capitalized, although if each of these titles were preceded and succeeded by "<" and ">", respectively, as they are presented in the direct format of Unicode, one could reason that their format is not incorrect&mdash;but rather an exact representation of how they are entitled in the Unicode Consortium. A format of these titles including neither the "brackets" nor the capitalization of initial letters is, in a sense, between the two possibly correct formats. For these reasons, I feel that it would be most suitable to capitalize the initial letters of the existing titles within Unicode charts and consider&mdash;but most likely not use&mdash;the uncapitalized, bracketed titles as a possible alternative format for these charts.&emsp;&mdash;  | J  ~  Pæst  |  02:29, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Nonsense from the word However. Unicode is clear. Old style "control" chars (think ASCII 00–20) are left alone. They only get a label (no name ever) for addressing the thing. -DePiep (talk) 00:13, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * For example: " " (the proper format in Unicode) and "Reserved" (the proper format in charts within Wikipedia) are correct, while the previous format of these titles ("reserved") is not.&emsp;&mdash;  | J  ~  Pæst  |  00:24, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm OK with capitalizing "Reserved", "Control", "Not a character" as the capitalization used by Unicode for the labels &lt;reserved&gt; etc. only applies to the restricted use in the Unicode Character Data, and it is reasonable to capitalize these terms in other contexts (see The Unicode Standard Table 4-12). With regard to control characters (0000-001F and 007F-009F), although they do not have actual character names, in ISO/IEC 10646 Section 11 they are explicitly associated with the names for the corresponding control characters in ISO/IEC 6429, and the Unicode Standard provides formal aliases for the control characters (see NamesAliases.txt) which include the ISO/IEC 6429 names and abbreviations. I would therefore support putting ISO/IEC 6429 names in parentheses after the word "Control", e.g. for U+0000, "Control (NULL)". I think that serves the user well, and is not in contradiction with the Unicode Standard, which explicitly allows the use of the Unicode-defined name aliases to refer to control codes. BabelStone (talk) 08:13, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

💮
FYI, it was not incorrect for 💮 to redirect to Emoji, since it is an emoji. It was not targeting an incorrect Unicode block, so your edit summary (“Redirected symbol to the CORRECT Unicode block: Miscellaneous Symbols and Pictographs”) is misleading. You do know, I assume, that Emoji is not a block. Gorobay (talk) 21:03, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that edit; I probably misinterpreted "Emoji" as "Emoticons". I will try to be more careful when making quick edits in the future. Thank you.&emsp;&mdash;  | J  ~  Pæst  |  02:38, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The redirect "💮" has now been fixed.&emsp;&mdash;  | J  ~  Pæst  |  02:51, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Please stop
We've got the CJK Extension C block article, list article, chart template, and template all caught up in a gigantic rat's nest. We've got it listed at the admins' noticeboard to try to sort it all out, but please please please don't edit anything else until we figure out how to fix this complete clusterfuck. VanIsaacWS Vexcontribs 00:21, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok, I think the only problem we have now is getting attribution, and the admins can take care of that. In the mean time, please discuss anything you want to do with the CJK extension C articles or templates on DePiep's page before doing them – I'll do the same, and I'll ask DePiep to do it too, just until we've got this whole thing completely sorted out. VanIsaacWS Vexcontribs 00:35, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Please see my response at WP:ANI, and keep in mind that I'm not accusing anyone of doing anything wrong. Nyttend (talk) 01:31, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Saw your request at WP:RM. I've declined it, because we first need to figure out what goes where, and because I'll perform any needed moves.  Please join in the discussion at Talk:CJK Unified Ideographs Extension C.  Nyttend (talk) 02:07, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Discuss ALL CJK Extension C edits BEFORE you make them
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Your edits are breaking attribution and messing up this content. VanIsaacWS Vexcontribs 06:07, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I have reverted my last edit to Template:CJK Unified Ideographs Extension C.&emsp;&mdash;  | J  ~  Pæst  |   06:31, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Tuareg
An image named "File:Tuareg – The Desert Warrior.jpg" does not exist, so stop replacing an existing image with a non-existing one. If you are annoyed from the lack of consistency between article title and image, move the image name to the correct title. However there are no rules for which the two names should be the same. My best, Cavarrone (talk) 07:56, 11 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Hello, Cavarrone. I understand that there is currently no file of such a name, which is why I have listed the image at Wikipedia files requiring renaming. However, this does not explain your reversion of my edits to the text of the article, where the hyphen-minus (-) was appropriately corrected to the en dash (–) in two instances. If you feel that the only purpose of reverting the edits was to keep the image in place, then you should not have reverted the entire edits, but rather the change of the file name, per se. Thank you.&emsp;&mdash;  | J  ~  Pæst  |   21:52, 11 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Ah, sorry, my mistake; you are free to modify all the hyphen-minus you can find in the article(s). Frankly the graphic difference between hyphen-minus and en dash is not something that I'm passionate about; my intention was just to keep the image in place. Now the file is moved and if you will find similar cases you will know how to correctly proceed, so the question is moot. Keep up the good work! Cavarrone (talk) 05:42, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Code-switching does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Cnilep (talk) 04:16, 17 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you for kindly notifying me. I have now provided a short summary on a third edit to the article.

Copy-paste
I saw that you created the template Unicode chart CJK Unified Ideographs Extension B, but failed to source the contribution. Please read and understand Copy-paste before you make any new content. This is a recurring problem, and it is absolutely unacceptable for it to continue. The next time you copy content from one page and paste it to another without attribution, I will be taking it to ANI. VanIsaacWS Vexcontribs 08:47, 20 May 2013 (UTC)


 * I have resolved this issue in my last edit to the template (see here for more information). Thank you!&emsp;&mdash;  | J  ~  Pæst  |   05:31, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Your edit to Template:R from alternative scientific name
I agree that the wording you changed could be improved, but simply saying "the correct name" falsely implies that a taxon can have only one correct name, whereas more than one name can be correct, depending on the taxonomic view taken. E.g. in the APG III system, Scilloideae is the correct name for a particular group of plants, whereas recent papers by specialists seem to prefer Hyacinthaceae. So at present the latter redirects to the former, but it may be that in future this will be reversed. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:26, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Lova Falk    talk   07:02, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Recent edits to Persecution of Jews
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! Amit (talk) 04:27, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Regarding this revert
Please see the talk page. Red Slash 17:29, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

My "prettification"
Hi. Regarding this revision, could you please show me any guidelines to this kind of issue? I made that edit because the way the link "Combining_character" appears is pretty unreadable for regular users. :) Best regards. CasperBraske (talk) 04:41, 26 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Hello, Casper. Your edit, though out of good faith, was not consistent with the format of other "main article" links atop sections of articles—especially those in the article List of Unicode characters. More specifically, these links were present in the following 38 other sections: C0 Controls and Basic Latin, C1 Controls and Latin-1 Supplement, Latin Extended-A, Latin Extended-B, IPA Extensions, Hebrew, N'Ko, Samaritan, Indic scripts, Thai, Lao, Tibetan, Burmese, Georgian, Hangul jamo, Ethiopic, Cherokee, Unified Canadian Aboriginal syllabics, Limbu, Latin Extended Additional, Greek Extended, Mathematical Operators, Miscellaneous Technical, Block Elements, Geometric Shapes, Miscellaneous Symbols, Dingbats, Braille patterns, CJK unified ideographs, Yi syllables, Syloti Nagri, Linear B Syllabary and Linear B Ideograms, Aegean Numbers, Phaistos Disc, Lycian, Carian, Cuneiform, and Emoji, of which 11 used links that included visible underscores, and of which all that used links to sections of other articles included visible number signs in the links to indicate section linking appropriately. It seems that you did not check the other &#8764;97% of such links, but somehow noticed and "prettified" one of them seemingly at random (without providing any sort of explanation in your edit summary to justify the change). However, even if you hypothetically had made the same edits to each one of these sections, there still would have been the questions of why you made the changes and how they were supposed to improve the article, yet with no explanation to follow. As for your recent note that the link previously was difficult to read, I agree with you completely. The proper edit, though, would have been to remove the underscores in the 11 sections including links with visible underscores and replace them merely with single spaces, which I've already done for you in this recent edit to the article. The use of the number sign is completely standard and should not be removed; it indicates both the actual title of the target page and the specific section it links to, without any ambiguity toward such. The more consistency, the better. Thank you for your concerns about Wikipedia… happy editing!&emsp;&mdash;  | J  ~  Pæst  | &#8202; 03:48, 28 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi again, JPaestpreornJeolhlna, and thanks for your reply. I made that edit in a mobile device, so I wouldn't have made all the edits "needed"—and provide explanation about them as well—in a million years. ;D What I really want to know is where I can propose this sort of improvement to the links to subsections, so I could also contribute with technical advise—I'm a web developer—to make them more readable, instead of having my edits undone. I edit two Wiki projects in three different languages for about 5 years, but have never been "able" to propose and make such changes, especially because they all seem to have their own standards. I would appreciate if you could show me the way. Best regards. CasperBraske (talk) 19:02, 1 July 2013 (UTC)


 * A good place to start might be the Teahouse. There, you can ask that the change in format is allowed. Unfortunately, the chances of any request like yours being accepted is low, but you might as well give it a try. Don't get me wrong; I think improving Wikipedia's visuals in this way is a good idea! But applying the change as a Wikimedia standard—in every language and every sister project—will be an extremely massive change. The only good solution, I think, would be to create an automated bot, which is something that I might be able to do, or at least request. If you need any more help, please let me know!&emsp;&mdash;  | J  ~  Pæst  | &#8202;&#8202; 02:45, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

USPS Rcat
Thank you very much! This Rcat's documentation page is in so much better condition now! –  Paine Ellsworth  C LIMAX ! 16:10, 7 July 2013 (UTC)


 * You're welcome! I'm always willing to improve a template's documentation page when needed. I do have a question for you, though: why did you create this redirect? Does it stand for "United States Postal Service"?&emsp;&mdash;  | J  ~  Pæst  | &#8202; 22:06, 7 July 2013 (UTC)


 * That is correct. And I feel that your created shortcuts in the notice will work even better.  Joys! –  Paine Ellsworth  C LIMAX ! 02:46, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * PS. Take another look at Template:RUSPA . The "Redr" template is a shortcut for the This is a redirect template, which is a sorting shortcut I use to save time.  Please note that I removed R ab because the initialism Rcat only works in the Main article namespace.  It will not work in the template namespace or any other namespace.  On a historical note, the Wiki software not long ago received an upgrade by the devs.  Before that upgrade, the Rcats all had to go on the top line next to the target link, with or without a space.  Now they work no matter what line we put them on.  Things are getting better! (PS added by –  Paine Ellsworth  C LIMAX !)

Template "R related"
There is a question asked of you at Template talk:R related. –  Paine Ellsworth  C LIMAX ! 21:58, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Your edit on Template:RfD subpage starter
I must sadly inform you that your edit, which though only added a dot, sadly broke Twinkle since then on WP:RFD. I understand you didn't know about that, as there was no information on Template:RfD subpage starter indicating this. Though generally for pages like this, automated and semiautomated tools use HTML comments like that as a pointer where to add data, and the code in Twinkle didn't account for a dot there at the time. → Aza Toth 20:22, 23 July 2013 (UTC)


 * I apologize! As you thought, I was not aware of the issue. If there is any way to keep the punctuation without causing this problem, please let me know; if not, I will gladly remove my edit (or let you or another editor do so). Thank you!&emsp;&mdash;  | J  ~  Pæst  | &#8202; 21:30, 23 July 2013 (UTC)


 * There's no problem now as I updated the code to take the dot in consideration. → Aza Toth 22:05, 23 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you for that; I appreciate your help.&emsp;&mdash;  | J  ~  Pæst  | &#8202; 22:09, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Dash
Regarding your edit: I did not write that "from 2000 to 2007" cannot be written as "2000–2007". The phrase 'not to in "from ... to ..."' means that "from 2000 to 2007" cannot be written as "from 2000–2007". If you find my phrase awkward, please make it more clear, but do not remove it completely, since it is important. Actually, "2000–2007" always means the range "from 2000 to 2007", and I think that it would be better to rewrite the previous sentence about "replacing to" in a more reasonable way. Thanks! — Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 22:59, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

The point
In regard to your edit summary, I know you think it's just a matter of choice and that I was being completely arbitrary. To find out what the point is, just check out R related to see the different way text is portrayed. An even better comparision is in my sandbox at: User:Paine Ellsworth/Sandbox2. The text above the double line is the text that would be rendered by the code you reverted to. The box below the double line is the way the same Rcats are rendered by the Redr (This is a redirect) template. So the point is that some of us are preparing for the time when text is allowed on redirects by using the Redr template to tag the redirects with categories. Right now, the only time you can actually see the text rendered by Rcats is when the redirect is disabled in an Rfd. "Live" redirects do not render any text. The ability to see text on redirects might be added at any time, because we have been trying for a long time to get the developers to make it happen – see. Joys! –  Paine Ellsworth   C LIMAX !</b> 02:03, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Not this way please
Hi,

Your username is unclear, you did not respond to my clear & serious answer (instead: you reverted), and you reverted our topic without even an es (edit summary, that is). -DePiep (talk) 21:28, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Let me clarify a detail: interwiki links are not to be added in the /doc any more. -DePiep (talk) 21:31, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Stop turning me into the bad guy. -DePiep (talk) 23:13, 7 September 2013 (UTC)


 * I didn't turn you into the "bad guy"; you chose to be it yourself.
 * If you would like to continue this discussion, please do so on your own talk page (original conversation here). Thank you.&emsp;&mdash;  | J  ~  Pæst  | &#8202; 23:25, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

ANI notice
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —DePiep (talk) 23:50, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

R from move
Hi, JPæst. I know how much you like to work sorting redirects—just want to make sure that you're aware of this TfD. –  Paine Ellsworth   <b style="font-size:x-small; color:blue;">C LIMAX !</b> 00:12, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you for notifying me; I will join the discussion shortly.&emsp;&mdash;  | J  ~  Pæst  | &#8202; 20:10, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Template shortcuts
Hi, re : Accordingly, I've removed the last two, and made the first one more intuitive. -- Red rose64 (talk) 10:48, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * is OK, if cryptic—I had to look it up to find that it's actually
 * doesn't exist
 * is inappropriate, since Template:Citation needed span is not a template shortcut
 * Hello, Redrose64. I've created R eh (a shortcut for "Redirect [with] extra hyphenation" that redirects to R from modification) upon realizing from your statement that I had not yet created it when the edit was made; thank you for reminding me. As for the template R tsc (R from template shortcut), it refers to the redirect itself as a template shortcut, which it is completely, not the target. Now that the issue regarding these two templates has been resolved, I will restore the changes. Thank you.&emsp;&mdash;  | J  ~  Pæst  | &#8202; 01:58, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

⎶ listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ⎶. Since you had some involvement with the ⎶ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). ï¿½ (talk) 13:03, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Template:R xw
When you created this redirect-template redirect, you added, which has never existed. Was this a typo?

(Also, current convention dictates that multiple redirect templates should be combined using .) --SoledadKabocha (talk) 18:07, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The discussion continued at WT:Categorizing redirects with a decision to create the template in question. --SoledadKabocha (talk) 22:48, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Multiple accounts
Please stop creating multiple accounts and explain why you have been doing so. Thank you. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 23:13, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Article moving listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Article moving. Since you had some involvement with the Article moving redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. John Vandenberg (chat) 14:31, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:R from proper noun
Template:R from proper noun has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:33, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

≟ listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ≟. Since you had some involvement with the ≟ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.  N Y  Kevin   22:00, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Template:Redirect at listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Redirect at. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Redirect at redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:52, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Template:Myanmar listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Myanmar. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Myanmar redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:57, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Template:Redirect sn listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Redirect sn. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Redirect sn redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mr. Guye (talk) 19:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Category:Redirects from numerals has been nominated for discussion
Category:Redirects from numerals, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:20, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Category:Redirects to numerals has been nominated for discussion
Category:Redirects to numerals, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:23, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Twelve (number) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Twelve (number). Since you had some involvement with the Twelve (number) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:52, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Monotypic taxon and Monospecificity
Articles that you have been involved in editing&mdash; Monotypic taxon and Monospecificity&mdash;have been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Nessie (talk) 18:53, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Unicode chart CJK Unified Ideographs Extension B
Template:Unicode chart CJK Unified Ideographs Extension B has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.  Zack mann  (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:17, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Unicode chart
Template:Unicode chart has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.  Zack mann  (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:44, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

"Template:R opt" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:R opt. Since you had some involvement with the Template:R opt redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 21:53, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

"􍁷" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 􍁷. Since you had some involvement with the 􍁷 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:29, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

"⋲" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ⋲. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 9 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:07, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

"⋳" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ⋳. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 9 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:08, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

"⋴" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ⋴. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 9 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:10, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

"⋵" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ⋵. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 9 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:10, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

"Template:R from slang" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Template:R from slang. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:18, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

"Template:R from slang term" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Template:R from slang term. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:18, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

"Template:R from missing punctuation" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Template:R from missing punctuation. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:42, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

"⧓" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ⧓. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 24 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:43, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

"⧗" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ⧗. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 24 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:44, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

"Template:R from verb tense" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Template:R from verb tense. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 4 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 18:55, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of songs containing the I–V–vi–IV progression for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of songs containing the I–V–vi–IV progression is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of songs containing the I–V–vi–IV progression until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:45, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

"Template:R from incorrect hyphenation" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Template:R from incorrect hyphenation. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 4 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:17, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

"Template:R from slang name" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Template:R from slang name. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 12 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

"Cylindricity" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Cylindricity. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 9 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 15:09, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ꯣ
Hello, JPaestpreornJeolhlna

Welcome to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, ꯣ, for deletion because it seems to be incoherent gibberish. If you want to practice editing-skills, please use the sandbox.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion] but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Iflaq (talk) 22:54, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

"Template:R to ca" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Template:R to ca. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 6 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pokechu22 (talk) 03:52, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

"Template:User:BracketBot/inform" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Template:User:BracketBot/inform. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 22 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin [cetacean needed] (she/they) 22:20, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

"Template:Ethiopic" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Template:Ethiopic. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 7 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Platonk (talk) 05:32, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

"Template:R from formula" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Template:R from formula and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 27 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:40, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

"Template:Redirect talk p" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Template:Redirect talk p and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 15 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Qwerfjkl talk  12:35, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

"Template:R si" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Template:R si and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 6 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:52, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

"Template:Ext" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Template:Ext and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 26 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 20:52, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

"Template:Extant" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Template:Extant and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 6 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 12:10, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

"Template:R to sub" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Template:R to sub and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 14 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 16:33, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Row-break
Template:Row-break has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 19:17, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

"Template:Redirect asn" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Redirect_asn&redirect=no Template:Redirect asn] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Plantdrew (talk) 02:41, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

"Template:Redirect to related" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Redirect_to_related&redirect=no Template:Redirect to related] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 16:47, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

"Template:R sub" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:R_sub&redirect=no Template:R sub] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. jlwoodwa (talk) 20:32, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

"Template:R ac" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:R_ac&redirect=no Template:R ac] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. jlwoodwa (talk) 20:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)