User talk:JPoNyC


 * }

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Jorge Pupo.actor.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Jorge Pupo.actor.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 04:58, 20 December 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:58, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Your page Jorge Pupo
...has not been deleted; when you moved it into the main encyclopedia space from your user sub-page at User:JPoNyC/Jorge Pupo, a redirect was left behind, and that is what I deleted.

I have to tell you that writing about yourself on Wikipedia is strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at Autobiography. I agree that what you have written is neutrally worded and well documented, and probably meets the requirements of WP:Notability (people). I see no reason to suggest deletion, but you should read the autobiography guideline and also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.

You should understand that no-one, not its first author and least of all its subject, owns a Wikipedia article - see WP:OWN. You must expect that others will edit it, and you will not be able to insist on a particular version. If any dispute arises, it should be discussed on the article talk page. There is good advice for people concerned about their own articles at Biographies of living persons/Help, which you should also read.

If you want to change your username, you can do that at WP:CHU. Read to the bottom of the page and then click on "Simple."

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:38, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

January 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Jorge Pupo, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 03:14, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)