User talk:JPskylight/Archives/2019/August

Disambiguation link notification for August 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
 * Income Tax Department ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Income_Tax_Department check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Income_Tax_Department?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Manu
 * Income tax in India ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Income_tax_in_India check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Income_tax_in_India?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Manu

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Fixed ith Dab solver. JPskylight (talk) 17:04, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Sevottam into Income Tax Department. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:29, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing out mistake. Copied content was just foundation from which article specific content was to be derived. It's could not be done then but it has been done now. JPskylight (talk) 19:20, 11 August 2019 (UTC)