User talk:JR00576

Welcome!

Hello, JR00576, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! -- WikHead (talk) 18:47, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Re: THANKS for helping with the Segal page
You're most certainly welcome JR00576, thanks for the note of appreciation. Best of luck with the development of your new article as well as those you are yet to create. Happy editing! :) -- WikHead (talk) 22:23, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your draft submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please take a look and respond if possible. If there is no response within seven days, the request may be declined. If this happens, please feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it when you believe the concerns have been addressed. (To resubmit the submission, add the text   to the top of the page)
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Nolelover   Talk · Contribs  19:11, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Responded to this message through email, thanks! JR00576 (talk) 19:52, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi!
Good job on the article. I put a blank sidebar in it so you can fill in the content and delete the lines you don't need. You might try adding sources like, ,. I also went ahead and added a picture.  MBisanz  talk 00:37, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

THANKS for your help! I am part of the Segal Network, which is a group of people who were awarded a Segal fellowship through Americorps, City-Year, and other programs. I am trying to get people in the Network to research and add to this article as a way to learn about our namesake. Does this violate any Wikipedia policies? Thanks!


 * It could violate WP:COI, but since you are only past fellows, I would just be careful and write neutrally with citations. I can keep an eye on things and tweak them as needed.  MBisanz  talk 15:19, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

MBisantz, that would be great! I would truly appreciate you keeping an eye on the article and thanks! JR00576 (talk) 17:38, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.)
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  00:09, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Alpha_Quadrant   (talk)  00:29, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

yo.
Nice job on the WP editing! I need to get back into the swing of things. You know, with all that huge amount of free time I have. doorautomatica  (talk)  05:06, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

THANKS
Thanks for the comments, I'm trying my best to contribute! JR00576 (talk) 06:43, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Rush Limbaugh – Sandra Fluke controversy
Rush Limbaugh – Sandra Fluke controversy has had changes in the length of biographical description of Sandra Fluke. It is currently quite minimal. If you have an opinion on how much biographical material on Sandra Fluke should be in the article, you can offer it on the talk page. —Anomalocaris (talk) 17:23, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! I'll look at it! JR00576 (talk) 17:50, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Congratulations
You are now a Novice Editor and I have awarded you the Burba Badge to reflect this fact. Keep up the good editing.  MBisanz  talk 18:46, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eli J. Segal concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eli J. Segal, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 18:15, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Atlas Shrugged: Part 2 concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Atlas Shrugged: Part 2, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:51, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Eli J. Segal


Hello JR00576. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Eli J. Segal.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:02, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers
Hi ,

In order to better control the quality  of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)